To: TobagoJack who wrote (70820 ) 12/21/2008 9:01:26 PM From: Maurice Winn 1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559 Merry Xmas and Ho Ho Ho to you TJ. May your sojourn on Bali be a happy finale to 2008. Much awaits us in 2009. Regarding your: Message 25270310 Yes, platinum, gold, QCOM GLD US$ yen, Kiwi$ and all the rest continue to drift in the wind and waves of financial relativity theory like flotsam in a Force 5 hurricane. So far so good, for me. Yes, it could have been better still if I had done the big short of HOV, TOL, FNM etc in 2007 as was highly tempting but that's life. It's fun to see the bouncing. NZ$ bounced up 15% in one go as US$ bounced down [though "bounce" is used as in dead cat]. Backing state-run fiat currencies has not seemed a good idea to me for over a decade though I have found myself in that position for 8 years now and not a bad thing it has been either. I'm working on their demise and my prototype is coming along nicely. Yes, it does seem that Taiwan and China are more likely to swap assets than explosives and that is an excellent thing to be encouraged. I suspect that Chen is not as criminal as is made out. It seems more likely to be "Victor's Laws" than real crimes, though given the propensity of those who seek power to leap any bounds, it wouldn't surprise me if he did pocket some change. Meanwhile, China should continue to enjoy some growth in 2008 as the competition for oil, coal, uranium, steel, timber and other resources and products reduces and the population continues to operate in relatively capitalist ways compared with the shambles of Mao's Maelstrom and the subsequent decades. China's main economic impetus has come from deciding to work for low pay for Foreign Devils again after nearly a century of chaos, war and communism, just as I got a personal GDP per capita increase when I decided to work for low pay for foreigners [in Canada, UK, Belgium]. It's an excellent strategy. Having done that, China now has sufficient productive capacity and knowledge base to produce for themselves, which is fortunate now that their main customer has gone bung. So yes, GDP growth should continue apace in China [even if not as apace as when debt was piling up wall to wall in the "rich" West]. That's a good thing because apart from wealth being inherently a good thing, they will be disposed to, and able to, buy loads of 450MHz and other OFDM/CDMA phragmented photon mobile cyberspace from me. It would NOT be a good thing if China and Taiwan were doing stupid things with explosives [or even just trade restrictions]. Incidentally, RoamAD [a little NZ company I invested in] has sold a Wi-Fi system to a nuclear power station in Taiwan. I much prefer to be selling such things than seeing the power station bombed. Life is better when megalomaniacs like China's bosses avoid going totally feral. Even if totally wealthy, drinking gold leaf seems a dopey thing to do, but each to their own. I have been known to spend a lot more than one QCOM share on equally pointless things - it's the curse of humans to do dopey things in the interest of "fun". It's annoying to see the "stimulus" and "rescue" and "free car factory" ideas of wastrel politicians as though them spending money will achieve anything worthwhile. Having wrecked things, they now presume to fix them. Expecting a bull in a China shop to make good the damage it did is foolish. Ironically, socialists of the world are ranting "See, capitalism doesn't work. We need regulation by we socialists and then things will be great. We told you so. Nyah, nyah, nyah." They don't see the nexus of their ideologies to the failures. Also, amusingly, people are saying that our great and estimable idol Alan Green$pan KBE admitted he got it wrong. But they don't read the fine print and all he said was he was shocked that shareholders and others with capital at risk took such little interest in not having their capital destroyed by excessive risk. It's not possible to legislate against people going nuts and destroying their capital through risky ideas, especially when the riskiness is largely inflicted by governments, compulsorily. But socialists will give it a go, and thereby make things even worse, leading inexorably to the dark interregnum you mention, if we are unlucky, which seems increasingly likely. Gung Ho, Mqurice