SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RMF who wrote (439096)12/8/2008 7:30:53 AM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574261
 
To "seal" the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan, massive number of troops would be needed. Take a look at a map. See pics of what the terrain is like.

In addition to the massive task of sealing the border, it would have been needed to be sealed in an extremely short period of time. Remember the Taliban had fallen and AQ and Taliban forces were driven out of Afghanistan by December 2001. Does anyone think we could get massive numbers of troops there in a couple months?

Remember the first Gulf War? Kuwait was invaded August 2, 1990. We didn't begin the battle to evict Iraq from Kuwait till Jan. 16, 1991. Most of that time was needed to get forces to the region. And it was easier to get forces to the Saudi-Kuwait border than it was to land-locked Afghanistan.



To: RMF who wrote (439096)12/8/2008 9:39:02 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574261
 
We wanted to do Afghanistan "on the cheap" and paying off Warlords to do the fighting was cheaper (and much less casualties) than sending our own guys in.

It wasn't about doing it on the cheap. Apparently, you haven't followed the subject too closely.

It was decided early on that the Northern Alliance was the best way to approach the situation because they were believed to have been committed to the operation and they knew the terrain exceptionally well, amongst other reasons. The Northern Alliance flat balked when it came down to it, but there was no indication up front that might happen.

I've never read any credible account that suggested that cost was a factor.