Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (149824)	12/12/2008 10:50:41 AM
From: Land Shark	1 Recommendation Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 173976

>You say "religious people do not have to be banned from anything" but you mean IF they are willing to violate their religious convictions. You think following religous convictions is a higher calling than obeying the law of the land?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (149824)	12/12/2008 6:21:49 PM
From: geode00	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

So you think it is perfectly acceptable to develop a religion that says all white people should be charged 50% more for all goods and services simply because they are white. There would be, of course, no recourse in fines, court action, etc. You also think it is acceptable for religious pacifists to refuse to pay taxes to the government while said government engages in military activities. Said pacifists should also not be required to enlist in any military service even if we have a draft....that should be a very popular religion with the young. You also think it is acceptable for religious pot smokers to smoke pot whenever they like and not be subject to any legal action because it is their religion requires the smoking of pot. You think it is acceptable that the fundamentalist Mormons should be able to have polygamous marriages. The possibilities for all kinds of religious freedoms are endless...you may have something there LOL.