Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The DD Maven -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (498)	12/23/2008 2:49:43 PM
From: im a survivor	2 Recommendations Respond to of 736

What is good for the goose is apparentely not good for the sandy shorts...

To: rrufff who wrote (498)	12/24/2008 1:57:16 AM
From: shortsinthesand	Respond to of 736

In this case you responded to me when I was responding to another poster.. REI pretty much respond to attacks and don't initiate them. I didn't even know of your alias at the time. This is how we started to debate over the years! I will go and dig up the links for our viewing pleasure! regards Santa Claus

To: rrufff who wrote (498)	12/24/2008 2:21:35 AM
From: shortsinthesand	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 736

here you go .. I made a post to alias dawson and you were my only reply to that post! siliconinvestor.com I am a survivor and you then ridiculed me waiting for my reply? siliconinvestor.com siliconinvestor.com LOL - I'm still waiting. "Waiting for Godot." You too - have a great weekend and be well. .....and when you got my reply: You didn't respond at all? siliconinvestor.com False,Misleading and lying prs, read them, good luck ====================================================== So rrufff when you say you only respond to attacks that is not true at all.. Here is what you said to me in this exchange of dialog.. Before this exchange I NEVER even knew who you were! "I have not been following the conversations here and noticed your post in the latter vein and, as I've seen you on other boards, decided to ask you for specifics. To that end, would you kindly explain which PR's you consider misleading and why. Do they rise to the level that the SEC would consider them violative of 10(b)-5 or other regs?" The fact remains to this day I was right and that JPHC lied in their PR's to sell stock. In fact I can't think of one SCAM that I posted on over the years where I was wrong? PLNI turned out to be one of the top PINK SCAMS in history and James Turek is now being investigated for massive FRAUD and had his stock both suspended and revoked! I could go to ever specific Stock board we have ever had a conversation on and show it WAS YOU and SURVIVOR who intiated the contact NOT ME!!!! Happy holidays Shorts