SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (257624)12/27/2008 9:01:20 PM
From: tecate78732Respond to of 275872
 
No I never did, as a matter of fact, I don't think Intel really ever thought IA64 would be last standing. Others do though. oh well.



To: Elmer Phud who wrote (257624)12/27/2008 11:23:00 PM
From: Dan3Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re: For as long as I can remember, Intel's roadmaps included x86 for as far as the eye could see. To suggest that Intel had any plans other than a far off hope that someday IA64 could replace x86, is simply nonsense.

Are you aware that it's not nice to lie? Or are you being sneaky and want to justify that statement as meaning Intel was going to keep selling IA-32 X86 CPUs for embedded systems and such after Intel transitioned the market to IA-64?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News