SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (3677)12/30/2008 10:14:33 AM
From: Wade Spencer Graves1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 86355
 
Look at it this way. Green energy cost 2x - 5x current price.
The economy must shrink somewhere to cover this added cost or the number of people must increase to maintain gdp.

where do you want to be on this? Energy Investment will increase population, cost of living, competition, and instability, invest in guns not butter!

More guns more killing lower population more stability?



To: Road Walker who wrote (3677)12/30/2008 4:03:52 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Respond to of 86355
 
I won't say we are standing still but we certainly are not leading in the key industry of the next, at least, 20 years.

Listen.. don't misunderstand me.. I would LOVE to see alternative fuels replace fossil..

I just want it to be economically competitive so that productivity is either enhanced, or at least consistent.

Personally, from what I'm seeing, I think the US is ahead in more pragmatic vehicles such as PHEVs (Volt and Fisker Karma), but we have to get the economic right.

And we certainly seem to be ahead in Thin Film Solar (FSLR and NanoSolar.. etc).

Hawk