Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Webster Groves who wrote (116118)	1/3/2009 6:26:53 PM
From: Kayaker	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206085

[[ My statement stands despite your misdirection. ]] Speaking of misdirection, your full and complete statement on the NAFTA issue is as follows... A US refusal to buy oilsands crude would breach bilateral committments in NAFTA. That is a false statement. US companies don't have to buy ANY oilsands crude. Or they can buy ONLY oilsands crude. They can buy any Canadian crude they want, or none. Even YOU contradict yourself in your next note... "If the US refuses to buy oilsands crude, that is their decision...." NAFTA simply means that Canadian oil companies cannot refuse to sell to the US. Again, as I referenced.... The only condition that NAFTA imposes on Canadian energy products is that all buyers in North America must have equal rights to buy those products. And that's my last post on the subject. Find somebody else for your pissing match.