SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Fairmile Gold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve Stakiw who wrote (3192)10/23/1997 6:28:00 PM
From: gennady  Respond to of 4057
 
Thanks Steve,
good news,
but analyzing the past performance:
should we expect another 15% drop in share price tommorow?
isn't this always a case with FLA
(hope I am wrong, but not holding my breath)
good luck to all.



To: Steve Stakiw who wrote (3192)10/24/1997 10:10:00 AM
From: I_C_Deadpeople  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4057
 
Steve, I am not sure you should have even bothered with this release. By the looks of it, FLA spent over $2.0 million US (1.4m from Echo plus AT LEAST .6 m of thier own money in the program prior to the EB alliance) and we come up with a STUNNING increase in reserves of 90,000 ozs. I noticed the market was so "caught off guard" this morning we fell 4 cents. Maybe they thought we were a Hong Kong stock.... sorry for the ranting but I am REALLY getting pissed off at this stock and it's lack of progress..

Steve, it is time to start getting some straight answers about this property:

1. The purpose of this year's program was to "maximize the shallow potential of the a/b/o and to test the newer targets to find out if they had potential". Given the release, can we now assume that none of the other targets ( except this new F zone where "it looks promising but we have no results" ) are worth anything? In 1996, we kept hearing about the promise of targets I and C. In 1995 it was Target J. This year it was L. So 1998 it is target F east?

2. What information are you and Tom Kelly planning to use to promote this stock that is not available to us? I have trouble picturing anyone getting excited about this stock based on the a/b/o low-grade resource plus some "promising" targets where there is little or no drill results released. You have no hope in hell in promoting this stock without some kind of "blue sky" potential.

There is a piece to this puzzle that we are missing and it is getting irritating trying to figure it out by ourselves. I am having trouble seeing why Echo would pay $3.00 for more stock in FLA at this time. I can smell a renegotiation coming at a MUCH LOWER price.....

Sorry for venting but as a long time FLA shareholder, each day it gets harder to believe that this stock still has the potential it once had.

EW



To: Steve Stakiw who wrote (3192)10/31/1997 5:38:00 PM
From: wychwood  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4057
 
Steve,
I am confused about how last year we already had 660,000 oz of gold and now we refer to last year's estimate is 500,000 oz which we are increasing by 14% (570,000?) what happened to the other 90,000 and aren't we supposed to have more gold the longer we drill?

Is there supposed to be an up to date resource calc soon and what do you speculate will be the total?