SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (447355)1/13/2009 9:38:54 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574056
 
Energy infrastructure and conservation works because it puts people to work and lowers peoples energy bill... a double stimulus and long term benefit. It may not pay for itself but at least it partially pays for itself. I think that is the model.

It also will lessen the US's trade deficit which will also help our credit problems.



To: Road Walker who wrote (447355)1/13/2009 9:59:34 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574056
 
RW, > What would you do if you were (sort of) responsible for 300 million people?

Nothing wrong with infrastructure improvements and a new "Manhattan Project" to get us off of Middle Eastern oil.

Beyond that, however, I don't think the government should do anything but hold the line on spending. Get out of Iraq; we don't need to be there anymore. That should save us a small sum of money. Then reform Social Security; people with the means shouldn't continue getting the same level of entitlements from the government. If people have a problem with that, let them pay more to keep SS the way it is.

Then let the Bush tax cuts expire, but also do away with the useless AMT. If you want to raise taxes on capital gains and businesses, fine by me, but any surpluses should IMMEDIATELY go toward paying down the debt. No ifs, ands, or buts.

Tenchusatsu