Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (448191)	1/17/2009 12:18:49 PM
From: combjelly	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577025

"Like Ted and SilentZ, yours seems to stop at the partisan boundary ..." It only seems partisan because you want it to be. Investigations are worth it if the potential for the crime is large. Given that you apparently cheat on your taxes, I think the answer is obvious. Any vandalism, if it existed, during the transition was on a small scale. And there is no evidence that it was worse than previous transitions, which was the whole thesis. Given the rather localized affects, it is better to implement preventative measures, such as signing off on the condition of work quarters than to go on a partisan driven witch hunt. Because any investigation would not reveal the ones who actually did the vandalism, but it would make a great partisan point. Of course, that assumes that you want to solve the problem rather than make political hay. Which seems to be your goal. It certainly was the goal of the administration.