Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (288412)	1/20/2009 1:37:35 PM
From: Neeka	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793955

Ohhhhhhhhh surely you jest? He must be the first President ever to have to worry about blackmail.

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (288412)	1/20/2009 3:43:52 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	4 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793955

Can you image the internal pain Obama must be going through on a daily basis? He knows he is a usurper and that he has to pay protection money to keep it secret. He must be the first President ever to have to worry about blackmail. This is just silly. If it is true, which I don't believe, Obama is rejoicing in his power to pull the thing off. Nobody will want to take down a sitting president over a birth certificate, so he's home free on this one. Doesn't free him from blackmail though, every President has done something to worry about. Can you just imagine Clinton's vulnerabilities? Personally, I think Obama's birth certificate is Hawain, but just has the wrong names on it. Something along the lines of "born to Stanley Ann Dunham, father unknown"