Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (288459)	1/20/2009 4:37:50 PM
From: Sdgla	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793958

Interesting benediction. Forgiveness, love, tolerance and solidarity. And then the old stand by's : black wont be asked to get back and brown and yellow can mellow and white can embrace right...whatever, jeez and amen. youtube.com

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (288459)	1/20/2009 4:59:08 PM
From: Peter Dierks	4 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793958

If it were so silly why would he pay three large law firms hundreds of thousands of dollars to hide it? This is just silly. If it is true, which I don't believe, Obama is rejoicing in his power to pull the thing off. Nobody will want to take down a sitting president over a birth certificate, so he's home free on this one. Doesn't free him from blackmail though, every President has done something to worry about. Can you just imagine Clinton's vulnerabilities? Personally, I think Obama's birth certificate is Hawain, but just has the wrong names on it. Something along the lines of "born to Stanley Ann Dunham, father unknown" If that were the case there would be no reason why he couldn't show it after the election. By then it would have just built solidarity with blacks. Clinton employed a different tactic. He deployed the most evil weapon in America to take down those who knew their vulnerabilities. Fortunately the Evil One was not just sworn in. If it were just a name thing why would he pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to hide it? It has gotten to the point now that people are offended when the correct term for child born out of wedlock is used in referring to a person.