Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (70037)	1/27/2009 9:17:02 PM
From: JF Quinnelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71178

"Still terrorists, you don't have to be a religious fanatic in order to be a terrorist." "Even if the report had said something like "we have definitive absolute proof that Saddam's government had no ties with Al Qaeda", that would do nothing to show "no ties with or support for Islamic radicals"." The terrorists who threaten the US are Islamic radicals. The terrorists Saddam had truck with were secular, descended from old Arab groups once funded by the USSR. Saddam was as much at risk from the likes of al Qaeda was we are.