SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: altair19 who wrote (158991)1/24/2009 1:30:21 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 362432
 
Right now some 11 year old is working on making blackberry jam. Cuz, when he does, he'll get a slap on the wrist and a job with the NSA. And cuz he'll score with the ladies.

That's just 11 year old thinking. Someday he will come to see a secure job is important, too. Haven't done that mice elf yet, tho.



To: altair19 who wrote (158991)1/24/2009 6:25:40 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362432
 
On a Downtown Train

newsweek.com

Obama is the first modern Metropolitan President—good news for ailing cities.

By Howard Fineman
Columnist
NEWSWEEK
From the magazine issue dated Feb 2, 2009

Inauguration day had turned into night. The mall was frigid and empty, trash piled against barriers lining the avenues. I was thawing in the MSNBC trailer when the mayor of Philadelphia arrived for a cable hit. Michael A. Nutter is part of the changing of the guard symbolized by the new president: he's African-American, Ivy-educated in his hometown at Penn, old enough to remember Martin Luther King Jr. and young enough, at 51, to see himself as a politician, not primarily a black politician. "Today was so inspiring," he said.

But Nutter was not dwelling on the emotions of the day. His mind was on the recession-gutted budget of his city. "We cut a billion dollars just last November," he said. "Now we've got to cut another billion over the next five years." During the transition, he said, he had spoken to the president-elect about the plight of the cities, including his own. "I got our message across, which is that the cities can be part of the solution, not just a problem."

Nutter has reason to hope. As glorious as it was to elect an African-American to the presidency, the political breakthrough with more street-level significance is that we've just sworn in our first modern Metropolitan President. Barack Obama has the right background to handle this economic crisis because the pain is concentrated in cities—in industries such as banking and finance—and it's where the revival, led by new energy efficiencies, might be most easily generated. "He understands the needs of the cities," said Nutter.

But meeting those needs won't be easy. They are vast—a shortfall in the budgets of cities and their suburbs of perhaps $50 billion in the next two years. Cities are facing quadruple indemnity: falling real-estate values, declining sales-tax revenue, shrinking pension funds and skyrocketing social costs. The Feds and the states pay most of the freight for health-care and unemployment benefits, but everything else—from schools to street repair to fighting crime—is mostly a local responsibility. In spite of all this, voters, of course, demand city services and blame the locals if they don't get them. "Every other level of government can kick responsibilities down to someone else," says Christopher Hoene of the National League of Cities. "We can't."

Mayors and metropolitan allies want direct infusions of cash from the Feds. "If you want to help the cities, don't send all of the money through state capitals," says Marc Morial, the former mayor of New Orleans who heads the National Urban League. "To create jobs quickly, including 'green' jobs, give the money directly." But metro areas face another obstacle: a mixed history of handling federal cash. "Block grants" from the Nixon years are long gone, but a reputation for corruption, incompetence (and self-indulgent concrete-pouring) remains. Rahm Emanuel, the new chief of staff, alluded to that history when he met with mayors in Chicago recently. "He told us that the new administration was going to help," said Nutter. "But then he added, 'Don't mess up!' "

Still, politics seems poised to turn its attention "downtown." A generation ago, after the urban riots of the '60s, a new ruling coalition emerged that linked the suburbs with the values of rural areas. We elected Republicans who rode horses, pitched horseshoes or chain-sawed brush, and Democrats who were reared in the small-town South. All that has changed: suburban areas, such as those around Philly, joined with their cities to support the urban Democratic ticket.

Now we have a president who found his wife and his identity on Chicago's South Side—a president who is part of what Gwen Ifill calls the "breakthrough generation" of practical-minded black politicians who are shaped, but not limited by, their heritage. Rather than touch on mystic chords of race, Nutter has kept it low-key in his talks with Obama. When the mayor met with him in Philadelphia a few weeks ago, he gave Obama a memo about how he's handling the mortgage crisis—an innovative plan that brings lenders, courts, sheriffs and borrowers together to prevent evictions. Nutter hopes it could be a national model.

Obama's train trip to Washington began with a rally at Philly's glorious temple of public transportation, 30th Street Station. Nutter took the occasion to pitch the president-to-be on why his city was the perfect place to launch new home-weatherization programs. Nutter has one for the city's 400,000 row houses that are "caulk-gun ready." "I told him we are a microcosm of America, and that our location makes us the perfect demonstration city." Obama was noncommittal, but he offered his congratulations nevertheless. "He told me he was very happy for me that I was so proud of Philadelphia," said Nutter. Now the mayor just has to rescue it.



To: altair19 who wrote (158991)1/24/2009 8:00:59 PM
From: SiouxPal  Respond to of 362432
 
How to Find a Turd in the Woods
Todd Palmer and Rob Pringle

There are a couple of ways to think about a monkey turd. You can look at it as a packet of undigested monkey food, which has passed through a monkey gut and collected a bunch of bacteria in the process. Alternatively, you can look at it, to borrow the phrasing of San Francisco State scientist Jennifer Jacobs and colleagues, as "an ephemeral resource in high demand by many organisms."

One beast's trash is another beast's treasure, and a poo pile in the woods provides food for flies, fungi, and other nutrient seekers. Dung beetles are perhaps the archetypal example of these ecologically important decomposers. Sacred to the ancient Egyptians, these critters eat, nest, or even live in dung pats, sometimes rolling outsized dung balls great distances.

The fundamental challenge facing dung beetles is, unsurprisingly, finding dung. This can be challenging in complex habitats where feces-producing mammals are scarce, such as tropical rain forests. Time is of the essence--arrive late and you might find that another poo pirate has stolen the prize. Success in the shit-eating business requires efficiency in locating the stuff.

Most forest dung beetles scan the understory for droppings, aided by a keen sense of something akin to smell. But a recent paper by Jacobs et al. in the journal Neotropical Entomology describes an entirely different and far more straightforward strategy, the logic of which is as follows. A turd is like a cigarette butt: if it's on the ground, that's only because some asshole dropped it there. If you want to be the first to find it, then just hang out next to the nearest asshole.

Jacobs et al. report this behavior in the dung beetle Canthon aff. quadriguttatus, which they observed "sitting and waiting" around the anal and genital regions of the brown titi and bald-faced saki monkeys. When the monkeys take a dump, the beetles drop to the forest floor and begin rolling the conveniently sized poo pellets away. This ass-riding behavior, called phoresy, has been described in other dung beetles, but the Jacobs paper notes a new case and provides the first visual evidence in the form of stunning full-color photographs.

At this point, you might be feeling as appalled as the young woman sitting next to us on the airplane as we type this, who keeps glancing sideways at our computer screen, then up at the flight attendants, then back at the computer screen, and who seems ready to reach for the air-sickness bag
any second. So try to see this from the beetle's perspective. You have six tiny feet, a set of wings, and a penchant for poo. Suddenly, you're no longer a puny bug clinging to the hair on a monkey's butt waiting for it to crap. No sir. Now you're a chocoholic hobo riding the Fudge Train to Fudgetown. Or one of those creepy self-righteous munchkins from Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, living alongside a fudge river as wide and brown as the mighty Mississippi.

Other fudge-related metaphors might also be appropriate; we invite you to post them in the comments section.

In any event, this is a winning paper. Sure, it's cool evidence for an evolutionarily adaptive strategy
to the classic ecological problem of finding food, but it's also more than that. It's an elegantly written research communication in an era when elegance in formal scientific writing seems to have gone the way of the dodo. In places, it's almost poetic: "From a distance, the beetles attached to the monkeys appeared as jewels or shiny water droplets." Emily Dickinson would be proud (we're not sure what Emily Post would think).

Elsewhere, we hear of a research assistant who "reported that a fecal pellet from a bald-faced saki monkey, with dung beetles attached, fell directly into his shirt pocket as he was observing monkeys in the canopy overhead." Fieldwork doesn't get any better than that, y'all.

As always, new findings raise new questions. Reconstructing the evolutionary history of the beetles, for example, would help us estimate when this behavior evolved, and how many separate times it has arisen in different beetle groups. Someone should get on that. But for now, check out the paper, enjoy the photos, and maybe take a minute to savor the fact that you're not a brown titi monkey. Or a dung beetle.

huffingtonpost.com



To: altair19 who wrote (158991)1/24/2009 8:06:42 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362432
 
Record-setting Stricker snatches lead from Perez
_______________________________________________________________

La Quinta, CA (Sports Network) - Steve Stricker snatched the lead from Pat Perez -- and set several PGA Tour scoring records -- with a 10-under 62 in the fourth round of the Bob Hope Classic on Saturday.

Stricker, finishing his two-round rotation on the easier PGA West courses, followed his 61 in the third round with a 10-birdie performance on Saturday that moved him to 33-under-par 255 for the tournament.

It set a new PGA Tour record for scoring in relation to par after 72 holes, passing Ernie Els' 31-under performance at the 2003 Mercedes Championship.

Stricker also set a scoring record for two consecutive rounds, posting a 123 over the last two days to pass the 124 Perez had in the first two rounds this week on the PGA West courses. Mark Calcavecchia previously held the record alone at 124.

Stricker birdied the last four holes, and six of his last seven, on the Nicklaus Private course to take a three-shot lead over Perez.

The tournament, played across four courses and lasting 90 holes, wraps up with the final round on Sunday.

"I don't know what to say. Everything was going well," said Stricker. "I made a lot of putts, I drove it really well, gave myself a lot of opportunities again and I kept telling myself just to keep making birdies because of the way the scoring is out here this year. It's crazy low."

Perez, who led after each of the first three rounds, didn't make a bogey on Saturday. But he managed only a five-under 67 at Bermuda Dunes -- a middling score for this shootout -- to slip three shots off Stricker's lead at 30-under 258.

Bubba Watson (63), Robert Garrigus (66) and Vaughn Taylor (68) were four strokes further back at 26-under 262, while John Merrick (63) was the only other player within eight strokes of Stricker at 263.

Stricker has posted only one bogey over the first 72 rounds. The highest- ranked player in the field at world No. 16 -- No. 8 Anthony Kim withdrew because of a shoulder injury -- Stricker claimed his scoring records despite starting his fourth round with four consecutive pars.

He made three straight birdies beginning at No. 5 and ending with a 15-foot putt at No. 7, drawing within three shots of Perez's lead. He rolled in a three-foot putt at No. 9 for another birdie, but didn't really catch fire until the end of the round.

Stricker started a birdie run by rolling in a two-footer at the 12th. He would birdie six of his last seven holes for the three-shot lead, finally passing Perez when he knocked an uphill chip shot within three feet at the 16th.

Suddenly on fire, Stricker's last two birdies came from 15 feet at the 17th and 12 feet at the last.

"I just tried to keep the pedal to the metal and keep it going," said Stricker. "My goal coming into this week was just to try to stay away from the bogeys, and I've done that for the most part."

Perez had a stranglehold on the lead after each of the first three rounds, boosted by his 61 on Wednesday and a 63 on Thursday.

But those two scores came on the easier courses at PGA West -- the Palmer and Nicklaus Private courses -- while his last two rounds were played at SilverRock and Bermuda Dunes.

The 32-year-old grinder started Saturday with a birdie on No. 1 at Bermuda Dunes -- beginning a round that was both bogey-free and a little disappointing.

Perez scrambled to make scores, stringing together six pars before making his second birdie at No. 8, which extended his lead to three shots. Back-to-back birdies at 11 and 12 pushed his lead to four, but he wouldn't make another birdie until the 18th.

By then, Stricker was making his move.

"I didn't hit it really well today," said Perez. "I missed some greens early, I got some drives going left, but I scrambled well and came back and I've just been putting great all week.

"The putting's really been saving me. I've had some five-, six-footers for par and I've had some 25-footers for birdies. Some are going in and the last couple days the longer ones have kind of crept out of the hole, but overall from short length I've putted really well."

Perez, who is making his 198th start on the PGA Tour, stopped short of saying that he expected to claim his first career win on Sunday. But his face told a different story.

"I'm not going to say it's my time (to win) -- it's no one's real time to win -- but I'm playing well," said Perez, whose best finish the last two seasons was a tie for third place at the 2007 AT&T National. "I don't want it to seem like I'm expecting to win, but I have it in my mind that I really am just going to give it my all."

The cut line -- finally made after four rounds -- fell at 15-under 273. In a good example of the low scores being posted this week, Jesper Parnevik fired a 61 on Saturday and still missed the cut.

The final round will be played on the Palmer Private course, where Stricker shot a 61 on Friday. Perez also had a 61 on the Palmer course Wednesday.

01/24 19:59:59 ET



To: altair19 who wrote (158991)1/24/2009 8:18:46 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362432
 
For bruised Caroline Kennedy, what's next?

google.com

By SAMANTHA GROSS – 5 hours ago

NEW YORK (AP) — Following a brief, torturous foray into the public spotlight, Caroline Kennedy has retreated back into privacy. And if there's one thing on which political spectators agree, it's that she is unlikely to rush to repeat the experience.

"After the beating that she took, a sane person would not want to subject themselves to that," said Doug Muzzio, a political science professor at Baruch College.

Her campaign for an appointment to the senate seat vacated by Hillary Rodham Clinton started with a halting rollout and ended this past week in a spectacular implosion — marred at the end by accusations leveled by someone close to the governor.

Kennedy is telling friends she won't be stepping away from the public sphere entirely, although it remains unclear what path she might take. Rumors abound that, given her early endorsement of now-President Barack Obama, she could land a federal appointment.

In a matter of months, America's dominant image of the daughter of slain President John F. Kennedy was transformed from that of the adorable little girl riding a pony on the White House lawn to that of someone more complicated — a woman who remained connected to her father's Camelot legend but who was now forging a bumpy public path of her own.

She drew fire throughout her campaign. Critics questioned her experience and accused her of profiting off her family name. She was attacked for declining to answer questions, then was lampooned for giving interviews replete with conversational fillers such as "um" and "you know."

Some accused her of not explaining clearly enough why she wanted the job, while others worried she seemed ill at ease under the spotlight and questioned if she could win election to the seat in 2010.

Friends and supporters maintained that the 51-year-old Kennedy was driven by a passion for public service. They argued that the unconventional path she had followed allowed her to build a resume as a fundraiser, mediator and legal thinker — all skills they said would help her excel on Capitol Hill.

Kennedy herself cited her "relationships" in Washington, and supporters believed her friendship with Obama and her closeness with her uncle, Sen. Edward Kennedy, would smooth her way. Associates said her verbal glitches had never gotten in the way of her reputation as a brilliant mind and gifted writer.

But early Thursday, she confirmed she had dropped out of contention, and on Friday Gov. David Paterson announced he was appointing Rep. Kirsten Gillibrand — a little-known Democrat from a rural upstate district — as Clinton's successor.

Kennedy's decision to withdraw played out messily Wednesday over hours of conflicting accounts in which she apparently wavered in her determination to win the seat, ending with a terse, one-sentence e-mail to reporters after midnight in which she cited "personal reasons" for her withdrawal.

On Thursday, a person close to the governor claimed she was facing possible tax and "nanny" problems, and there were media rumors that her marriage was on the rocks. A Kennedy spokesman complained that the mudslinging demeaned what had been a fair process.

The governor eventually said in a statement that no candidate had been disqualified by vetting.

The bitter back-and-forth caused at least short-term damage to Kennedy's image — and may have reflected even more poorly on Paterson.

One Kennedy friend involved with the process said later that Kennedy had a "minor issue with a nanny" that the governor's staff reviewed and found to be irrelevant. The friend, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the situation, also said Kennedy had a minor, $615 city tax lien that she settled in 1994 and no other tax problems.

The friend, who's been speaking with her nearly daily in recent weeks, said Kennedy had expressed a desire to continue looking "for ways to serve."

"She would like to serve in some capacity, but it's a little too fresh to know what that capacity might be," the friend said.

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., said Friday he had spoken to Kennedy and was sorry she wouldn't be taking the New York seat, which once was held by another Kennedy uncle, Robert F. Kennedy.

"I think she really was put in a very difficult position, almost impossible one, but she'll go on to do terrific things," he said. "She just made a personal decision for a number of reasons this is not the right way to do it and it's not the moment to do it, and I can understand that."

Kerry even speculated that she might still one day run for office.

That would shock Muzzio, after what he called "the trashing that she's suffering from the Paterson folks." But Lee Miringoff, director of the Marist College poll, said Kennedy could still have a shot.

"She would have to regroup, but people have come back from worse," he said.

The longer she waits, the more the power of the Kennedy mystique will fade, argued Rutgers University politics professor Ross Baker, who noted that few younger voters feel the Camelot-era pull toward her family.

"The Kennedy appeal has become kind of quaint," he said.

If Kennedy returns permanently to private life, she could continue her fundraising work on behalf of New York City's public schools or move into an under-the-radar advisory role, akin to the job she had as a member of Obama's vice presidential search team.

But Kennedy has long acted as one of the primary tenders of her family legacy — writing and editing books that have helped to keep alive the Kennedy mystique and working to guide family efforts such as the selection of the John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage Award winners. With that history and her professed passion for contributing to political and social change, she may not be willing to fade into the background.

Writers for The Washington Post and at least one British newspaper wondered whether she might follow in the footsteps of her grandfather, Joseph Kennedy, as the U.S. ambassador to the United Kingdom.

Many have suggested Obama might offer such a post or another appointment in part out of gratitude for her endorsement during the Democratic primary contest, which came at a key moment in his showdown with Clinton.

-Associated Press Writer Glen Johnson contributed to this report from Boston.



To: altair19 who wrote (158991)1/25/2009 2:47:18 AM
From: stockman_scott2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362432
 
John Thain and the curse of being No. 2

money.cnn.com

On Wall Street, when the going gets rough, the second-in-command gets the ax.

By William Cohan
contributor
Last Updated: January 24, 2009: 11:30 AM ET

(Fortune) -- Even before the revelations of the undisclosed massive losses, the early payment of billions of dollars in bonuses, and the delicious $87,000 rug, John Thain's days at Bank of America working for Ken Lewis were clearly numbered.

For the simple reason that when things start getting dicey on Wall Street, even in its present devolved state, being No. 2 on the totem pole is by far the riskiest and most dangerous position of all.

So as Bank of America's (BAC, Fortune 500) stock spiraled downward some 40% in the first three weeks of 2009, following the Jan. 1 closing of its acquisition of Merrill Lynch, into the mid single digits, and the pressure began mounting on Lewis to explain how he could possibly have agreed to pay $29-a-share -- some $21 billion in stock by the end -- for a nearly bankrupt Merrill Lynch, it became increasingly obvious that either Thain or Lewis had to go.

Even though it was Lewis, and Lewis alone, who agreed to save Merrill from a fate not dissimilar to that of Lehman Brothers or Bear Stearns with a minimum of due diligence during the fateful weekend of Sept. 13-14, by the immutable laws of Wall Street power and loyalty, Thain was the one to be jettisoned. This much was obvious.

Thain, to his credit, appeared to understand his role well. He could not have served himself up for slaughter any more obligingly than he did. First, there were the unexpected departures of two senior Merrill executives Greg Fleming and Robert McCann, due, in part, to their reported clashes with Thain, an ex-Goldman Sachs co-president who had been brought in to Merrill in late 2007 after the "retirement" of CEO Stan O'Neal. Strike one.

Then there was the late disclosure of billions in fourth-quarter trading losses, which may have derailed the merger had Thain disclosed them before the Merrill and Bank of America shareholders voted on the merger on Dec. 5. Strike two.

Then there was Thain's end-of-year Vail vacation and his desire to head off to Davos, even though Lewis recommended against it. Strike three.

Then came the billions in bonuses paid a month earlier than Merrill had paid bonuses in the past (although, in fairness, Wall Street firms about to be swallowed up in an end-of-year merger tend to pay bonuses just before the takeover is completed). Strike four.

And then, the piece de resistance: the revelation by Thain's enemies that he had foolishly spent $1.2 million redecorating his office at a time when Merrill's prospects were dimming rapidly and major layoffs were looming. Had Thain not remembered Dennis Kozlowski? One can only assume that Thain must have asked Michael Smith, his fancy Los Angeles decorator, to measure the rope for the noose while he was at it.

Few before him have made their new boss look as bad, as quickly, as did Thain. On the other hand, on Wall Street, there is a long and distinguished list of heir-apparents jettisoned by their bosses as the barbarians were at the gate.

In this current crisis alone, we have enjoyed being able to watch Stan O'Neal, the CEO of Merrill before Thain, fire Dow Kim and Osman Semerci, among others; John Mack, the CEO of Morgan Stanley, serve up his president Zoe Cruz; Jimmy Cayne, then CEO of Bear Stearns, decapitate co-president Warren Spector; and Dick Fuld, then CEO of Lehman Brothers, lop off Joe Gregory, the firm's president, and Erin Callan, its CFO.

At Citigroup, the practice has a long and distinguished history. Sandy Weill eliminated both John Reed and Jamie Dimon. Chuck Prince, when he was CEO of Citigroup, extinguished Tommy Maheras and Todd Thomson, his onetime CFO. When Vikram Pandit took over from Prince he zotzed Michael Klein. At Lazard, the longtime patriarch Michel David-Weill coldly dismissed Felix Rohatyn, Steve Rattner, Bill Loomis and even his son-in-law Edouard Stern.

The sad truth is that the strategy of forcing others to take the fall for your poor decisions can only work so long. Nobody forced Bank of America to buy Countrywide Financial or Merrill Lynch. These were both ego buys, with a dash of patriotic duty thrown in for good measure. They weren't necessary for Bank of America to keep doing well at what it was doing.

Ken Lewis, you even knew better, when you famously said, in October 2007, "I've had all the fun I can stand in investment banking right now."

In any event, Ken, you are all alone on the front line now. Just ask O'Neal, Cayne, Fuld, Prince and David-Weill if you don't believe me.

*William Cohan is author of "The Last Tycoons: The Secret History of Lazard Freres & Co" and the upcoming "House of Cards: A Tale of Hubris and Wretched Excess on Wall Street."






To: altair19 who wrote (158991)1/25/2009 8:37:24 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362432
 
Could Tom Brady and Matt Cassel Be the Next Joe Montana and Steve Young?

bleacherreport.com