SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Katelew who wrote (101727)1/24/2009 7:38:46 PM
From: cosmicforce  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543200
 
<a school curriculum originated from within the scientific community>

Scientists can believe in God. They just shouldn't bring him to the science classroom. I would like to know which scientists brought this forward as a scientific argument. It isn't anymore than some of my speculative ideas about things are scientific. I can speculate a lot of things that might be true but aren't falsifiable.

ID is not falsifiable. How do I prove a fit-for-purpose gene sequence is NOT the product of intelligent design? It presupposes an intelligence as a given - you have to have an Intelligence to have Intelligent Design. Bring forth your intelligence for testing. Have the intelligence walk into the class and teach ID if it can. If it can't it isn't very intelligent, or it is too magical/mystical to teach in a classroom.



To: Katelew who wrote (101727)1/24/2009 7:57:03 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543200
 
I just learned that the push to include teaching the theory of intelligent design in a school curriculum originated from within the scientific community, not the religious community.

That seems odd. ID doesn't qualify as a theory in the scientific sense of the word. It has no basis in science. It may be a theory in common parlance (meaning "speculation") but it is not "theory" in the same way evolution is "theory." Any reputable scientist would know that.



To: Katelew who wrote (101727)1/24/2009 7:58:37 PM
From: cosmicforce  Respond to of 543200
 
< Is the Big Bang concept taught as theory or fact?>

Both Big Bang and Evolution is taught as a theory. Why? It can be falsified by measurement. How do I falsify your Intelligence behind Intelligent Design? A single fossil of angels predating trilobites would invalidate evolution. Short of that fossil, most likely a fake by someone with an agenda, Evolution is the preeminent theory.