Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (101943)	1/26/2009 12:59:10 PM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 542983

<science that which is not science> It is difficult matter since the voting population can't discern what is and isn't a scientific theory. Just because someone proposes a theory doesn't mean it is a SCIENTIFIC theory. That is crux and members of the public rarely have the patience to learn what is at issue. If their theory isn't scientific, people tend to take that personally. It isn't - it is about what is and isn't science. Not what is or isn't valid, or is and isn't open to discussion in general, but only what is open to discuss in Science. It muddles the issue when it is assumed that when something won't be taught that the basis for rejection is a bias against religion, or that theory, when in actuality it is about keeping science scientific.