SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (451016)1/26/2009 1:42:17 PM
From: combjelly1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1574439
 
"CJ is weighing pros and cons. How is the "full of it?""

Because Tenchu only reads posts looking for a "gotcha". Even if he has to make one up...



To: SilentZ who wrote (451016)1/26/2009 2:02:24 PM
From: Tenchusatsu2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574439
 
Z, > Fewer people are making a living wage today because of Walgreens and CVS.

Same argument was used against the industrialization of the early 1900's. Same argument was bogus back then as it is now.

Why don't you prove that Walgreens and CVS was directly responsible for fewer people making a "living wage" today?

Tenchusatsu


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News