SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Amati investors -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Milkman who wrote (27771)10/24/1997 3:50:00 AM
From: pat mudge  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 31386
 
[chat]

<<< Pat's voice not at all what I expected, it was good to hear you.>>>

I opened my mouth and someone else's voice came out. :))

I've decided I'll just have to ask questions more often. Get some practice.

Cheers!

Pat



To: Milkman who wrote (27771)10/24/1997 10:01:00 AM
From: Andy Donati  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 31386
 
Milkman/All,

The following "should" not be a problem in interoperability as both follow the ANSI DMT standard for ADSL on the telco side and the 802.3 Ethernet standard on the non-telco side of the modem:

Central Office___________________________ Customer site

==Ethernet Alcatel (ANSI)ATU-C------------ATU-R(ANSI)Amati Ethernet==

However, when a vendor implements a protocol like PPP over ATM on the non Telco side of one modem and the other modem has ethernet on the non Telco side there will be problems.

I would like to see Amati modems fully interoperate with Alcatel modems. When you think of it, it would be advantageous to the Telco carrier as well. Lets say that a telco that has Alcatel exclusively
needs to deploy a number of modems before a certain time period and Alcatel has problems delivering that quantity before the deadline.
The telco can then purchase the remaining modems from Amati with no interoperability concerns.

As far as ANSI ADSL and ATM on the same chip, I hope to see the standards committee and the ADSL Forum to have some say and get involved to promote interoperability. This way TI, MOT, ALA, ADI, etc can all be compatable.

Just my opinions. Other opinions welcome.

Regards, Andy