SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LoneClone who wrote (117196)1/29/2009 5:34:33 PM
From: upanddown  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 206223
 
I have also heard about the huge opposition in BC to pipelines and terminals.

So why does Enbridge talk about this PL like it is just a matter of getting some permits and building it?

I notice that Kitimat is close to 100 miles inland at the end of a long series of narrow channels. Hmmm.

I know that tankers from Valdez have to go west of the Queen Charlottes and Vancouver Island and enter Puget Sound through the Strait of Juan de Fuca. Canada does not want them near the BC coast.



To: LoneClone who wrote (117196)1/29/2009 9:36:52 PM
From: axial  Respond to of 206223
 
The present BC government has chosen a narrow interpretation of the law, stating that it doesn't apply to tankers destined for BC ports, only to tankers destined for other ports and passing through BC coastal waters ;)

Jim


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News