Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Welcome to Slider's Dugout -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Webster Groves who wrote (14998)	2/2/2009 4:40:09 PM
From: Mike M2	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50337

WG, en.wikipedia.org The big increase in WWII production occurred during 1941-42 . I can't find other lines of production online but Richard Overy's " Why the Allies Won" for example US tank production 1940 - 400 ; 1941- 4,052 ; 1942 -24,997 ; 1943 -29,497;1944 -17,565 . US Wartime production in 1942 saw a huge increase over 1941. Production prior to 1941 was small.

To: Webster Groves who wrote (14998)	2/3/2009 7:14:50 AM
From: Northern Marlin	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50337

Are you able to make a logical argument? In post #14993 of this thread you stated: Separately the US itself was building up its own war making ability and that started in '39 with the start of WWII. That earlier infusion of contracts to industry likely the beginning of the end of the Depression in the US. I responded in post #14995 that you were mistaken and provided U.S. government statistics showing employment in the military supply industry to be 300,000 in mid-1940 (labor force 55.9 million, unemployed 8.8 million) and 2.5 million in mid-1941 (labor force 56.9 million, unemployed 6.8 million). These employment figures showed that it wasn’t until 1942 that government procurement of war materiel had a dramatic effect on employment. In post #14999 you belittle my argument with this barb: I suggest avoiding the DOD for your economic data, try the real world. A better choice would have been for you to concede that the U.S. government began to plan for building up its war making ability in 1939, and you were mistaken or careless when you wrote: the US itself was building up its own war making ability and that started in '39 Then a civil discussion could have continued whether government spending on the war effort helped to end the Depression. Instead, you expose yourself as a fool: In the same post (#14999), you mention GNP and refer readers to an excerpt from a basic economics text written by a professor of economics at a college in Indiana. GNP? How did that get measured? Who measured it? You don’t think the professor measured it himself, do you? I’m gonna take a wild guess that GNP statistics provided in the professor’s text came from… the U.S. government! So, according to you, one should avoid U.S. government employment statistics and seek economic data from your “real world”, like GNP statistics provided by… the U.S. government! Yes, in your “real world” you are brilliant!