SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: energyplay who wrote (117397)2/3/2009 10:14:22 PM
From: ChanceIs2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 206151
 
>>>Sharp decrease in Large SUVs, replaced with "cross over" car based SUVs.<<<

I would respectfully suggest being careful throwing this notion around. Certainly new SUV sales dropped through the floor. Conversely waiting times for new efficient cars ran out to a year - if you wanted one painted yellow.

I can make a very strong case based upon my eBay SUV searches, that the bottom has fallen out of the used SUV market. I would suggest that used SUVs have gotten so cheap that they would pay handsomely to drive even with $4 gasoline. The up front capital car cost has become quite small. At today's $2ish gasoline, the argument is even stronger.

Now the automakers are getting pasted and I understand that there are about 100 acres of brand new Mercedes sitting in the Port of Los Angeles begging for a new home. So it might be the case that these new - assumedly efficient - cars might ge pushed out and over the old cheap SUVs just to clear inventory.



To: energyplay who wrote (117397)2/4/2009 7:52:05 AM
From: wherry  Respond to of 206151
 
Surely one should add to the "supply downsides" the general figure of more than 5% annual compound depletion? It seems to me to be the ghost at the party. Noone looks at it, but we all know its there just out of obvious sight.

Regards, Tony.