SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Trading Cabana -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Wexler who wrote (4899)2/4/2009 7:05:52 AM
From: RockyBalboa  Respond to of 6370
 
SRS works like a gambling machine. Like Kevin posted earlier, those are retail vehicles and as an "investment" they likely don´t work. The gamble effect is that they can suck a lot of wind, then out of nothing they can show large gains in a short timeframe. But there is no trend (other than it has a serious "grind"). I was always happy to skim some dollars from SRS but stopped after some accidents.

Even SKF did much better recently. I suspect SRS is simply chasing a too small tradeable volume of underlyings.



To: Bill Wexler who wrote (4899)2/4/2009 6:39:28 PM
From: RockyBalboa  Respond to of 6370
 
What continues to wonder me how dumb and shortsighted BAC and Ken Lewis must have been when they so ridiculously overpaid MER.

reuters.com

This Merrill Lynch deal has become a fiasco for Ken Lewis," said Ralph Cole, portfolio manager at Ferguson Wellman Capital Management in Portland, Oregon. "His whole reason for grabbing Merrill Lynch was getting the brokers, and what he ended up with was gigantic writedowns from the part of the business he didn't even want."

Lewis had coveted Merrill for its brokerage force, often known as the "thundering herd," and which he called the "crown jewel" of the roughly $19.4 billion takeover.

Remember, Barclays and also Nomura paid nothing for the two-legged goodwill of Lehman Brothers at the same time.
And JPM paid very little for Bear Stearns a half year earlier.



To: Bill Wexler who wrote (4899)2/5/2009 2:12:16 PM
From: KaiserSosze  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6370
 
Hey Bill, thoughts on UYG long at this level?



To: Bill Wexler who wrote (4899)2/7/2009 4:07:47 PM
From: Schnullie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6370
 
A less sinister explanation....the fund more or less performs as advertised but the arithmetic of volatility often sinks it.

morningstar.com