SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (454454)2/5/2009 7:17:23 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576600
 
Ted, > As soon as a freeway is announced, developers are buying land along the right of way and developing housing. That's why its at capacity when it opens.......developers artificially create the demand.

Developers do not have any magic ability to "create the demand."

In a car-centric society like ours, people prefer freeways over light rail when given the choice. If the existing freeways are filled to overcapacity (e.g. LA, NY, even Portland and Seattle along the I-5), light rail starts looking like a viable alternative.

Tenchusatsu



To: tejek who wrote (454454)2/13/2009 7:21:36 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576600
 
As soon as a freeway is announced, developers are buying land along the right of way and developing housing. That's why its at capacity when it opens.

To the extent that is true, its just the reason (or really a reason, there is no way that all the demand comes from new development decisions) for my statement being true "The fact that its almost full right away shows that there was real demand for it".

The demand might be moved to where the road is being built by the actions of the developers. Well then good. That means we efficiently use the resource of the new road, rather than having a new road that isn't used, while having a bad traffic jam as developers build in areas where new capacity isn't being built.