Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (81154)	2/9/2009 3:48:45 PM
From: one_less	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"Actually the past attacks that have already occurred would still be justification for a counter-stike, if there is good reason to believe the counter-stike will be effective." There is a colonization of interests and issues that stem from ancient grievances, the majority of which cannot be dealt with until or unless the current justifications for a cycle of violence is ended. Strike/counter-strike justifications have been self regenerative for a couple of generations now and I have little patience with the rhetoric on either side of that issue. Frankly, it is my position that if you are going to dispose of a serious enemy threat you must either defeat them completely Ghengas Khan style or completely subdue them as an assimilation to a greater society. I just thought I'd play around with this neutralization theory abit. It's probably a waste of time.