Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (455495)	2/10/2009 11:29:29 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574767

Ted, > And why do you think that is? Because they can absolve themselves of their share of responsibility. It's hypocritical to talk about eight years of wasteful spending only to advocate eight more years of wasteful spending, thinking "This time it will be different First of all, the proposed spending is not wasteful.....because the vast majority of the spending is not pork projects like the bridge to nowhere or the spinning wheel museum in Aiken, GA. Its for real projects that are needed like replacing bridges on the verge of collapse or improving mass transit. Secondly, it pisses me off to no end that you all can't stop whining about this bill when your mouths were sealed shut for nearly 8 years while the real abusive spending was going on. You all are a bunch of partisan hypocrites. Third, it IS different. Its too bad your brain is so closed to that real possibility.