Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : CCEE Breaking Out -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steven R. Bergman who wrote (7350)	10/24/1997 1:59:00 PM
From: Rick	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12454

Steve, I have always believed that you are an honorable person. I think that came through EVEN in my recent post where I was extremely angry with you over your choice to feed information to a participant in a dialogue privately rather than on this thread. I still believe that that was unfair. Not just to me but to all of the readers of this thread. I told you that if you could go through your prior posts and establish where you had said everything that you said in your late published e-mail that I would PUBLICLY APOLOGIZE TO YOU. You did not do that. I did. I said that I believe that you are an honorable person. I meant that and I still believe that. I too am an honorable person. In going through all of your posts I have established that I could make the argument that I was correct and that you DID NOT cover EVERYTHING in prior posts that you mentioned in that e-mail. If I made that argument Steve that WOULD BE SOPHISTRY because with but minor exceptions you indeed covered the major areas in prior posts. A fair reading of those prior posts as well as this one established that you are consistently and singularly the most balanced poster on this thread. That most certainly includes me because I try to be the voice in the wilderness that brings some hope of balance against the onslaught of biased POSITIVE CRAP. Thus Steve please accept my voluntary PUBLIC APOLOGY for inferring or saying that you lied.A fair reading of your posts established THAT YOU DID NOT LIE, AND I APOLOGIZE FOR MY UNKIND STATEMENTS MADE TO YOU. If you can see your way to accept my apology then perhaps you will grant me the face saving understanding that my statements to you were raised in the heat of great unkindness on this thread directed not only at me but someone who was brutalized. Again and to my credit I did say THIS, That abuse of another person is best shown by the comparison of your MEASURED response, and the VITRIOLIC ABUSE of the other.

To: Steven R. Bergman who wrote (7350)	10/24/1997 2:13:00 PM
From: Stan Price	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12454

Steve, Feel free to step on my posts whenever you want. You do raise some valid points and it's probable that the market for this product is much larger than we imagine, assuming that there is a deal with BT, as you've said. I do have one question on the technical side concerning something you said. You made the statement "To the degree that the bills are larger, the data binding facility in the 4.0 browsers will enable just relevant sections of a huge bill to be downloaded once a report is requested." I thought, in a previous discussion, that the "server" portion of the program would do the actual search of the database to accumulate the data that had to be downloaded, and that that was the real benefit. Even if the 4.0 browsers utilize data binding, is not the actual search of the database performed over the phone lines. Maybe this is not a legitimate question and I should go back to my pipes and fittings and leave the technical stuff alone.