Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (18961)	10/24/1997 4:11:00 PM
From: Bearded One	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 61433

Yes, I certainly would, and have. I don't want to take up any more time of yours than I already have. Best of luck in your investments (unless they run counter to mine), and in everything else.

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (18961)	10/24/1997 4:25:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 61433

JJ, it's not too late....bring it on over to the CSCO thread, folks over there won't lie about you....I'm sure Mrs. Cramer would agree. BTW, this market sux....bp

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (18961)	10/24/1997 4:54:00 PM
From: Carmine Cammarosano	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 61433

Well said Cramer...question, I know you have liked CSCO a lot in the past with respect to the networkers...how do you rank the top 3 networkers(COMS, ASND and CSCO) and the industry overall...do you see them as long-term plays or trading stocks? Finally, does it concern you that CSCO has not been able to hold on to new highs? Thanks in advance...

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (18961)	10/24/1997 6:02:00 PM
From: Izzy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 61433

JJ Cramer: I personally find the tone of your comments disturbing (similar to what you use on street.com e mail replies). I really don't understand why you are using SI and ASND thread in particular. Some of us are just novice investors/traders who are trying to be successful in their stock investments. Harsh words are bothersome to me. What do "no problemo" and ^%$&(#$$%% mean? How do you find the time to post here (just curious; you seem to be a very busy person)?

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (18961)	10/24/1997 9:12:00 PM
From: Sector Investor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 61433

I was looking back through your posts and don't think this initial post has been addressed. techstocks.com Why DO they post negatively - bruised egos, bad trades or what? This seems typical ANALyst and reporter behavior - very negative on good companies when they are down near the bottom of their range, and super bullish when they are near the top. This is of course the opposite of what smart investors should be doing. If thestreet.com has no axes to grind, why aren't they reporting objectively (or do you think they are)? Q2 and Q3 were adversely impacted by the 56K and 56K/TNT problems, but they appear behind ASND now. IMO, with the NTT, UUNET and AGIS contracts, plus the Europe TNT revenue that didn't get into Q3, Q4 should be an upside surprise (from lowered estimates), so why is this not recognized? Also, one of your posts mentioned ASND being a good buy when it hits $30. Since it already did once, you must think ASND has not bottomed yet? Do you think ASND will yet move lower?