SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : RMIL - The Swaysayers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: I Am John Galt who wrote (5)10/25/1997 1:26:00 AM
From: Just My Opinion  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95
 
matty: You are a piece of work. When they made you they broke the mold. Then they beat the HELL out of the moldmaker. Yeehaw!!! al




To: I Am John Galt who wrote (5)10/26/1997 7:49:00 PM
From: michael d kugler  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95
 
Matty,

Thanks for posting the message regarding me. You will find, if you ask enough people on SI, who and what I really am, and what my purpose is.

Hope your thread is a success.



To: I Am John Galt who wrote (5)10/26/1997 8:09:00 PM
From: lavalamp  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 95
 
Matty G,

This thread might be useful if it is not overwhelmed with minutia. Hopefully my questions and or comments will not fall in that group but it will be up to the readers of this thread to decide for themselves.

I have seen several posts that stated the tax net operating loss was a significant asset and should be considered in determining the fundamental value or worth of OVIS and RMIL. I have mentioned that a change of ownership for tax purposes (and after the merger OVIS will be treated as having a change of ownership) creates limitations on the amount of net operating loss that can be utilized each year. This limitation can (and appears to be ) significant in this situation. If anyone is serious about doing a fundamental value calculation without considering this issue they are doing themselves a disservice.