Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (187799)	3/2/2009 10:17:39 PM
From: John Chen	Respond to of 306849

"Drop 2862 points.... -30% ... Obama ..." See, Jim, the market is very much racially divided. gggggggg

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (187799)	3/2/2009 10:54:47 PM
From: bruiser98	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

I wonder what the figures would look like if you used the $ndx and $compq indices. The 2000 crash was a crash of the tech bubble. $compq 7 Nov 00 3416 5 Mar 01 2143 1273 difference >33% 4 Nov 08 1780 2 Mar 08 1323 457 difference >25% , <33%

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (187799)	3/2/2009 11:16:10 PM
From: ajtj99	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

Yeah, and the Nasdaq didn't drop from 2892 to 1387 in from Jan. 31, 2001 to April 4, 2001, did it? That's what, 52% during the first days of the last administration? Let's just say you have no argument and leave it at that. No administration is bigger than the business cycle regardless of what Clinton or Reagan may think, and Clinton needs to put a sock in it about bragging about the bubble gains on his watch.