Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (462287)	3/9/2009 2:52:52 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576894

Funny you would quote Illinois not Arkansas. Maximum unemployment benefits by state... by the way the key word is maximum, most get less: sfgate.com

To: i-node who wrote (462287)	3/9/2009 2:53:10 PM
From: combjelly	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576894

"This is determined state-by-state. IL is different from TX which is different from NY." A little, but important fact you left out. "In IL, a person can $534 when married with a child. As usual, my "theory" is upheld." Only because you moved the goal posts. "I just proved it, liar." No you didn't. You got your hand called. "Food stamps and Medicaid, for example." At least for the food stamps, a bad one. ers.usda.gov "I think you're playing dumb to waste my time." So, it is playing dumb to show you have a busted flush and have been trying to BS your way out?