SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LLCF who wrote (189738)3/11/2009 11:11:21 AM
From: stockman_scottRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 306849
 
Bernard Madoff: The Villain America Needed

thebigmoney.com

By chadwick.matlin

Created 03/10/2009 - 4:16pm

Dear Mister Madoff:

Before it’s too late, I wanted to thank you for all that you’ve done for America. It’s been reported that Thursday you will plead guilty [1] to 11 criminal charges, meaning you will spend the rest of your life in jail. A legacy like yours should not go unmarked as you fade into history.

And so I’m writing you this letter to honor your contributions to American society. I’m not speaking about the thousands of people you’ve defrauded [2]. Nor am I referring to the (less than [3]) $50 billion you made evaporate overnight. And those two [4] people [5] you caused to commit suicide? Disgraceful, of course, but not all that you should be remembered for.

I, unlike the rest of our compatriots, will choose to exalt your gifts, not just your sins. Like the way you single-handedly forced Congress to acknowledge just how crappy the SEC is at doing its job [6]. Like when your downfall helped unearth a dozen other Ponzi schemes [7], proactively saving millions of dollars. And I, for one, do not think you’re only the basest kind of American—a man driven by greed, power, and an unchecked case of OCD [8]. No, you, sir, are an American patriot. Your selfless sacrifice is overlooked by the hate-first-think-second mass media. You gave the American people somebody to despise when they needed it most. In our economic era, you may not have been the villain we wanted, but you were the one we needed.

Bernie—may I call you Bernie?—you arrived at just the right time. In December, when you admitted your fraud, we Americans were spewing anger, but it wasn’t directed at anyone in particular. President Bush? He was on his way out of office, and we had already vented our frustrations at the polls. The CEOs of subprime lenders? Countrywide was absorbed by Bank of America; Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac belonged to us, the very people they helped ruin. Wall Street? Too many CEOs, all of whom you could call greedy only if you understood what in God’s name a credit-default swap was [9].

But then you descended from the Lipstick Building [10]: a middle-aged, extremely wealthy white guy from New York—exactly the demographic at which Main Street wanted to direct its scorn. (Your Judaism probably didn’t hurt.) Instead of conning via derivatives, you conned through deceit. And we can understand deceit. That you had nothing to do with the root cause of our economic crisis didn’t matter. You messed with Elie Wiesel, and when you screw with Holocaust survivors, it doesn’t matter what kind of financial villain you are. You were evil. Case closed.

But that’s all surface-level. I believe your real use came in the kind of scam you were running. If I may put it so baldly, Bernie, you made wealth disappear overnight. Money that your clients thought was there actually wasn’t. This is the same thing that happened to homeowners when the housing bubble burst. And it’s the same thing that happened to investors when the Dow started its death march. Even though your clients were mostly rich, we could sympathize with their loss, because it was a proxy for our own. We found common ground in our hatred of you.

Bernie, this all sounds awful, I know. But there’s a reason I’m dragging you through this painful retelling of your greatest sins. We needed to be united, Bernie, and without you we wouldn’t have been. The real cause of our financial meltdown is too nuanced, too impossible to cause total agreement across the country. You, however, were different. You gave us an easy target—a man who was selfish, greedy, and indiscriminate in his destruction. You offered an outlet for our frustration, and now your life sentence gives us a small piece of justice to cling to in these dark, hopeless days of the recession. You were our catharsis. That the Dow jumped 380 points—5.8 percent—on the day you pleaded guilty is surely coincidental, but I choose to see it as a collective rallying cry: You may take away our retirement funds, but you will never take our financial freedom!

And, Bernie, it’s not all intangible. Your legacy has left us with lasting, concrete effects as well. Let’s look at your shamed nemesis, the SEC. Before you came on the scene wearing your iconic (and, frankly, awfully smug) grin, the SEC was a rotting corpse waiting to be unearthed. We knew SEC Commissioner Christopher Cox—he of the inept short-selling ban [11] and John McCain’s ire [12]—was asleep at the till, but we didn’t realize the SEC was as well. Your arrest in December not only showed that the SEC couldn’t detect schemers; it proved that they couldn’t do it even if their tip lines were ringing in their ears. I speak, of course, of Henry Markopolos [13], a man you must admire for his dogged devotion to a single cause—your downfall. And we needed Markopolos for his perfect encapsulation of all that was wrong with the SEC: “too slow, too young and too undereducated.” In a perverse twist of fate, Bernie, you indirectly became your own kind of whistleblower.

And it wasn’t just the SEC, but the entire regulatory morass that you helped expose. Part of the trouble in catching you was that the agencies investigating your Ponzi scheme kept passing the buck. The SEC pawned off responsibility to FINRA. Just in case you’ve purged their acronym from your memory as some sort of defense mechanism, it stands for Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. FINRA said it didn’t have the authority to do anything about your Ponzi and that only the SEC could do that. The SEC, meanwhile, was wishing you would just go away, which is why it gave you to FINRA in the first place.

But now changes are afoot. FINRA has created a whistleblower’s office [14] to help monitor and act on fraud tips. The SEC, meanwhile, is undergoing a full review of its fraud procedures and has already changed some rules to allow for employees to issue subpoenas more easily in fraud investigations. And you’ve successfully pissed off Congress, which should help ensure the SEC remakes itself into an agency that can prevent men like you ever from doing this in the future. That the agencies already caught Allen Stanford [15] is a promising step, one that may not have occurred without your downfall. Job well done, sir.

You have, quite simply, become the best kind of scapegoat: one who manages to inspire change while encapsulating an era’s hurt, pain, and frustration. Mrs. O’Leary and her cow permanently altered fire-safety regulations [16] in this country. Typhoid Mary helped expose our woeful lack of preparation [17] in public-health crises. Kenneth Lay’s opaque ledgers at Enron [18] personified corporate greed, which inspired new transparency legislation [19].

Without you, Bernie, we would have stewed in our internal anger. And we would have had nobody to catalyze change for the future. Know that while you spend the rest of your life in jail, I’ll be thinking of these noble contributions. And I’ll be thankful.

Sincerely,

Chadwick Matlin

P.S. If you get this before you’re locked away, feel free to e-mail me at Chadwick.Matlin@gmail.com [20]. I’m eager to hear your thoughts.

Source URL: tbm.thebigmoney.com
Links:
[1] bloomberg.com
[2] mailto:http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/st_madoff_victims_20081215.html
[3] tbm.thebigmoney.com
[4] msnbc.msn.com
[5] washingtonpost.com
[6] youtube.com
[7] nytimes.com
[8] nymag.com
[9] thebigmoney.com
[10] online.wsj.com
[11] money.cnn.com
[12] newsday.com
[13] boston.com
[14] online.wsj.com
[15] sec.gov
[16] en.wikipedia.org
[17] en.wikipedia.org
[18] en.wikipedia.org
[19] en.wikipedia.org
[20] mailto:Chadwick.Matlin TBM@gmail.com



To: LLCF who wrote (189738)3/13/2009 11:05:42 PM
From: stockman_scottRead Replies (4) | Respond to of 306849
 
Madoff Family Had $826 Million Net Worth, Filing Says

By David Glovin and Christopher Scinta

March 13 (Bloomberg) -- The family of Bernard Madoff, who pleaded guilty yesterday to masterminding the largest Ponzi scheme in history, claimed a net worth of $826 million as of December 31, according to a court filing.

As part of a request to free Madoff from prison before he is sentenced in June, Madoff’s lawyers today filed court documents with the U.S. Court of Appeals in Manhattan. Included was Madoff’s financial statement, which he filed in a civil lawsuit brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The document had been filed in that case confidentially.

“Net worth (assets minus liabilities) $823 to $826 million,” the document says. Of the $826 million in net worth, Madoff said that $700 million was the net value of his ownership in Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. The document says the Madoffs’ liabilities were $265,000.

Madoff’s brokerage, which is being sold to pay victims of his scheme, may fetch no more than $10 million, according to Larry Tabb, founder of TABB Group, a financial-market research and advisory firm. The brokerage, which is being marketed to potential bidders, had earnings of just $1.12 million last year, according to documents drawn up by investment bank Lazard Ltd.

Other than the value of Madoff’s business, the largest assets claimed by the Madoff family are $17 million in cash and $45 million in securities. Last week, U.S. District Judge Louis Stanton, who is presiding over the lawsuit against Madoff by the SEC, said the money manager’s lawyers claimed that his wife, Ruth, alone owns $17 million in cash and $45 million in municipal bonds. Ruth Madoff also claims ownership to a Manhattan apartment that the filing says is worth $7 million.

The attorneys said Ruth Madoff claimed those assets are “unrelated” to the alleged multibillion dollar Ponzi scheme orchestrated by her husband, Stanton said.

Ponzi Scheme

The document was filed a day after Madoff, 70, pleaded guilty to defrauding investors of as much as $65 billion in the largest-ever Ponzi scheme. His attorneys filed a request with the appeals court that Madoff be freed from prison until he is sentenced on June 16. Madoff faces 150 years behind bars for using money from new investors to pay off old ones in a scheme that ran from at least the early 1990s.

“I operated a Ponzi scheme through the investment advisory side of my business,” Madoff told U.S. District Judge Denny Chin at yesterday’s hearing in a courtroom packed with victims and members of the media. Speaking publicly for the first time since his arrest on Dec. 11, he said he was “deeply sorry” and knew what he did was criminal.

Dan Horwitz, a lawyer for Madoff, didn’t immediately return a call.

Cash, Securities

Madoff and his wife had $17.03 million in cash, the document says. Between $4 million and $7 million was owed to Ruth Madoff from their sons, the document says. The Madoffs had $45 million in securities, in addition to Madoff’s interest in his market-making and money-management businesses, valued at $700 million, the document says.

The couple valued their East 64th Street apartment in Manhattan at $7 million, their house in Montauk at $3 million, their home in Palm Beach, Florida, at $11 million, and their residence in Cap d’Antibe, France, at $1 million. The furnishings for the homes are worth $9.9 million, according to court papers.

The Madoffs also had $2.6 million in jewelry and a 50 percent share in an airplane valued at $12 million, according to the court document.

Four Boats

The family has four boats, according to the filing. Ruth Madoff owns a 2006 Leopard yacht named “Bull” in France, which is worth $7 million; a vessel named “Sitting Bull” in Montauk, worth $320,000; and a boat named “Little Bull” in Florida, worth $25,000. The Madoffs also own a Rybovich fishing boat moored in Palm Beach valued at $2.2 million.

The Madoffs put their total liabilities at $265,000, including $100,000 in credit card debt, $151,000 in accrued real estate taxes, and $10,000 owed on a car lease.

The Madoff’s expenses totaled $346,758 a month, largely for maintaining and insuring their homes and boats, the document says. Their expenses also include $100,000 in monthly legal fees and $140,000 for personal security each month, according to the court filing.

Peter Chavkin, a lawyer for Ruth Madoff, and Mauro Wolfe, a lawyer for Bernard Madoff, declined to comment.

It’s unclear if investigators will pursue the Madoff family assets. Kevin McCue, a spokesman for Irving Picard, the trustee liquidating Madoff Securities, didn’t immediately respond to a phone call or e-mail seeking comment. Prosecutors have said that as much as $170 billion that flowed through Madoff Securities since the start of the fraud may be subject to seizure.

The case is U.S. v. Madoff, 09-cr-00213, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporters on this story: David Glovin in New York federal court at dglovin@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: March 13, 2009 18:30 EDT