Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cymer (CYMI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sepku who wrote (6534)	10/25/1997 6:02:00 PM
From: Steven Angelil	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25960

Style, I have gone out on a very big limb on this one too. I figured if mgnt. proved to be reliable(which of course, they have) that by Christmas I would be in a very happy place:-) Well, we get our earnings, but what timing, huh? I was explaining to my Mom what stock we were most heavily invested in and I compared to being involved with a Cisco, Intel or Microsft one year after their ipo. No guarantees of course, but I think Cymer could end up in the same category, eventually. Steve

To: sepku who wrote (6534)	10/25/1997 6:07:00 PM
From: TideGlider	Respond to of 25960

Short sellers are different. They don't look down the barrel of great earnings and follow Al Fanken to the monkey house! Saying a stock with no bad news is a buy is a market mover. Saying a stock with good news is a sell moves nothing. Bruce

To: sepku who wrote (6534)	10/25/1997 6:34:00 PM
From: flickerful	Respond to of 25960

style... let us not forget barron's slant; recall the shabby mention of cymer post monkey downgrade, and following the ms debacle when they described the ritz conference appearance... they said that cymer simply answered none of the analysts questions about the rumors, etc, implying to readers that they should infer the answers may have been admissions. i liked akins comment about the absence of any need to respond where no facts exist...yes, let dlj do it in appropriately legit context. barron's was way off base, like so many in their treatment of cymer. the proof was in the earnings pudding, and barrons,and fleckens****** can eat it with the lot of them...humbly, just like pie.