SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KLP who wrote (297239)3/19/2009 10:04:12 PM
From: mph  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793838
 
There's nothing magical about Connecticut wage law. CA has similar laws, but the waiting time penalties are limited to 30 days of wages.

There's also nothing obscure about these laws.

Wage and hour cases have been the hot ticket for big class action litigation for a few years.



To: KLP who wrote (297239)3/19/2009 10:49:51 PM
From: Bearcatbob  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793838
 
"One thing is certain: The debate over these payouts is far from over. And Connecticut's wage laws are likely to never be the same again."

To paraphrase Slick Willie - it all depends on what the meaning of is?

Laws are becoming meaningless in the face of the unruly mobbed stoked to rage by scum bag politicians!



To: KLP who wrote (297239)3/20/2009 8:37:35 AM
From: Elroy  Respond to of 793838
 
Don't forget what I used to do for a living.

What was that?

Recruiters have to be at least familiar with Employment Laws, and good ones have to pass a State Test. I passed that test.

Again I have no idea what you're talking about. I thought recruiters just helped employers and employees find each other (for a fee). What recruiters have to pass state tests?

And I read your article, and I'm not sure what your point is. Sorry, but please explain yourself in simple English.