SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (466789)3/27/2009 1:00:24 PM
From: Tenchusatsu1 Recommendation  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1575171
 
Inode, I find it funny that those saying Social Security is "solid" are the same people who think trillions of dollars of deficit spending is just fine as long as it's a liberal who's doing it.

Remember, it's all about "ideology" ... ROFL

Tenchusatsu



To: i-node who wrote (466789)3/27/2009 1:07:23 PM
From: Steve Dietrich1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575171
 
You're wrong.

The SS Trustees report says it's 100% solvent until 2042 and then, with no changes, could pay 75% of benefits for the rest of the 75 year projection period. With modest changes, it's 100% solvent throughout the 75 years.

And this is with relatively conservative growth projections. Reality has consistently outperformed the Trustees projections.

The propagandists among us have tried to tell us that a potential deficit confronting SS in 2042 is a crisis today.

Yet theses same people, for the last 8 years, have presided over a government which every single day, every single year, spent more money than it took in. Never once did they treat these real deficits happening now, not projected to happen in 30+ years, as a crisis. (Could you imagine if the US was projected to be deficit free until 2042? We'd be dancing in the streets, not screaming "crisis.")

People pushing such dishonest propaganda about SS are not to be taken seriously. And thankfully, nowadays, they're not.

SD