To: Elmer Phud who wrote (259280 ) 3/31/2009 5:13:10 PM From: fastpathguru Read Replies (3) | Respond to fpg, that was no concession, it was part of a point you may have to face one day. Reasonable people apply a single standard. You've applied different standards depending on who they are applied to. If there is no evidence proving AMD Management was involved that proves they are innocent in your mind. If there is no evidence proving Intel Management was involved then Intel is still guilty, again in your mind. By your reasoning and if we applied your standard then AMD is once again guilty of stealing Intel IP whether or not we can prove Management involvement. individual was, acting on his own behalf and NOT AMDs, as far as anyone (i.e. the FBI) can tell.If you believe that the actions of a single rogue employee at AMD do not implicate the entire company then you are going to have to apply the same standard to Intel if you want to be reasonable and consistent. I won't hold my breath.
