Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fastpathguru who wrote (259471)	4/6/2009 12:19:07 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

FPG, > Yes, I rejected your explanation that the growth in Hammer's acceptance following the launch of the suit was mere coincidence as facile, non-conclusive, and not even contradictory with the idea of the lawsuit providing some cover. LOL, if it isn't even contradictory, then your original question was irrelevant. AMD never was viewed as a serious player in servers until Opteron came along. But the server market does not turn on a dime. You assume that right after Opteron came out, it should have been adopted right away by all the major server OEMs, but that assumption flies in the face of reality. Then the whole "legal cover" nonsense takes the absurdity to a whole new level, as if AMD can sue their way out of their own incompetence. Tenchusatsu