Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sam who wrote (7233)	4/15/2009 3:06:21 PM
From: Bearcatbob	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86356

"Most people who talk about the drastic cuts talk about 2050. " 2050 would give time for new technologies to evolve. Hydrocarbons would be very expensive by then so the market should drive replacements in a natural manner. Unfortunately we have fools in Washington like Waxman who cannot wait for 2050 to exert their power. My point is simple - only a train wreck will achieve major reductions by 2020. Obama is on course for a wreck. He is either uninformed (ie stupid), of evil intent or delusional. If I were to be charitable I would say he is staking out very aggressive positions from he can compromise and achieve what he really wants. I do not think he is stupid. I do not think he is deliberately of evil intent. I do believe he may be delusional on the subject in that he has been so immersed in the looney left that he has come to believe it all. Let's see what happens with GM and Chrysler to see if he ever walks the talk on all his talk of sacrifice by all - not just the top 2% of tax payers. Bob