SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (472810)4/17/2009 1:37:12 PM
From: SilentZ2 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1574212
 
>But I think the "fast food" mentality toward sex has a real detrimental effect on society, much like actual fast food is having a detrimental effect on physical health. Why build a relationship when you can just have "casual sex"?

Having a relationship just so you can have sex is worse than having casual sex, IMO.

-Z



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (472810)4/17/2009 2:26:15 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574212
 
Actually, I think Chris's pursuit of prostitutes is actually preferable to Z's approach. Chris is honest. Do all of Z's casual partners know its casual? Doubtful.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (472810)4/17/2009 5:30:12 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574212
 
Z, > I don't have time to cook for myself, but I still need to eat.

I don't want to come across as a judgmental prude (except to Bentway, but anyone is a prude compared to that deadbeat).

But I think the "fast food" mentality toward sex has a real detrimental effect on society, much like actual fast food is having a detrimental effect on physical health. Why build a relationship when you can just have "casual sex"?


Uh.....if you haven't met someone you love with whom to build a relationship, why can't you have casual sex? After all, your sex drive doesn't go away when you don't have an emotional connection.