SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Taro who wrote (473536)4/20/2009 3:09:54 PM
From: Steve Dietrich  Respond to of 1575931
 
Duplicate.



To: Taro who wrote (473536)4/20/2009 3:10:25 PM
From: Steve Dietrich1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575931
 
Yep, the South went to war with the North because they believed in slavery, as Confederate VP Alexander Stephens explained:

The new constitution has put at rest, forever, all the agitating questions relating to our peculiar institution African slavery as it exists amongst us the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization. This was the immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution. Jefferson in his forecast, had anticipated this, as the "rock upon which the old Union would split." He was right. What was conjecture with him, is now a realized fact. But whether he fully comprehended the great truth upon which that rock stood and stands, may be doubted. The prevailing ideas entertained by him and most of the leading statesmen at the time of the formation of the old constitution, were that the enslavement of the African was in violation of the laws of nature; that it was wrong in principle, socially, morally, and politically. It was an evil they knew not well how to deal with, but the general opinion of the men of that day was that, somehow or other in the order of Providence, the institution would be evanescent and pass away. This idea, though not incorporated in the constitution, was the prevailing idea at that time. The constitution, it is true, secured every essential guarantee to the institution while it should last, and hence no argument can be justly urged against the constitutional guarantees thus secured, because of the common sentiment of the day. Those ideas, however, were fundamentally wrong. They rested upon the assumption of the equality of races. This was an error. It was a sandy foundation, and the government built upon it fell when the "storm came and the wind blew."

Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its corner- stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition.


SD



To: Taro who wrote (473536)4/20/2009 3:27:16 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575931
 
>> This country until very recently belonged to that group.

It is over. Obama has effectively surrendered our sovereignty to the UN, the Mideast, Europe, and just about everyone else in sight.



To: Taro who wrote (473536)4/20/2009 5:16:11 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575931
 
Some people fight for what they believe in.

This country until very recently belonged to that group.


Aren't you glad you're leaving? You are leaving, aren't you?