Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Valuepro who wrote (155778)	4/28/2009 10:46:50 AM
From: LoneClone	6 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 312670

Please take your ideological name-calling elsewhere. You should be ashamed of yourself for bringing this kind of garbage here! CD? LC

To: Valuepro who wrote (155778)	4/28/2009 11:59:36 AM
From: marcos	1 Recommendation Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 312670

Got no time during market hours for boring partisan politics, VP, but later i'll make you a classically liberal, i.e. completely non-socialist, argument as to why governments should shift taxes from income to petrol, to the point of not usd2.00/gal, try more like usd6.00/gal, and that only the thin end of the wedge, ramping it upwards from there ... meantime however until one pacific there is trading, let's try to get along and make a buck vst.v, stp.v, cmk.to - strong on a day others aren't ktn.v - offered at .45, that's a nickel above kitty level ... gotcha in re the 43-101 Frankly, yes i did misunderstand cgh.to - pullback from last week's little bump up, remains an opportunity imho ... scanned everything three times, don't see any obvious changes to make, back on the road to scare up some more buy power

To: Valuepro who wrote (155778)	4/28/2009 4:09:37 PM
From: Valuepro	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 312670

O.k., one more time so that no one can possibly be offended as no offense was intended anyway. I was not attacking any poster here for their implied or professed political, social or economic leanings. I don't do such things in public formats under an alias or otherwise - not my style. Nor am I generally inclined to prompt political debate as I sometimes find I lose respect for others I may have admired before I heared of their leanings. Knowing that, I'm certain some others would feel the same way about me, so I tend to keep my mouth shut on such issues. Therefore, I regret that what I said was perceived in any as insensitive, intolerant and demeaning. So, here's a third expression of what I wanted to say... "IMO, if oil trends toward 20 dollars per barrel, that will invite a lot more taxes on gasoline that are not likely to disappear when oil prices trend higher once again." Fair enough? VP in AZ Cactus hugger & environmentalist