SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 50% Gains Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (77603)5/4/2009 2:50:31 PM
From: Paul KernRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 118717
 
I'm not convinced that the governments won't do the right thing and withdraw liquidity as required.. (which the bear view assume as a given)...

I'm worry that Bernanke doesn't have testicles to do the right thing and I also worry that with plants closed, workers laid off, and inventories cratered, we may have demand driven inflation.



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (77603)5/4/2009 4:44:01 PM
From: TommasoRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 118717
 
>>>I'm not convinced that the governments won't do the right thing and withdraw liquidity as required.. (which the bear view assume as a given)...
<<<

Now wait . . .

Are you saying that the bear view assumes the governments WON'T withdraw liquidity?

What I assume is that if the DO withdraw liquidity, that action will knock equity markets down much below the lows seen to date. Interest rates will be competing with small returns on equity. Remember that in 1982, the combination of ten years of serious inflation and high interest rates was holding back stock prices to real levels much below where they had been at least 16 years earlier.

I also assume that while commodities will continue to be cyclical, the cycles will be at a much higher price level.