SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mishedlo who wrote (97266)5/5/2009 6:32:58 PM
From: Elroy Jetson  Respond to of 116555
 
To the best of my knowledge it's not currently illegal for American Express, Capital One and likely other credit card issuers to use "Redlining" to refuse loans based on the geographic location of the borrower's address and the perceived or actual conditions there.

By not pulling a credit report on the loan applicant, the lender is also likely not to be subject to the Fair Credit Reporting Act and other laws which might apply.

The practice of redlining was made illegal in mortgage lending by the Fair Housing Act of 1968 and The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977. Unless there is a law which extends this other lending, as well as mortgages, it looks like these lenders have covered their tracks -- which makes it likely this overt behavior will attract legislative action, like the Mish Fair Lending Act, which prohibits redlining in all consumer lending.
.



To: mishedlo who wrote (97266)5/5/2009 10:08:34 PM
From: dave91 Recommendation  Respond to of 116555
 
So the bank is really saying, things are going to get worse? And the bank is changing the way it will conduct business because things will not change or turn around for a long while?

There is more to this than Scott not getting a credit card.

I take it that COF has significant losses on credit cards and is scared. So scared they are pulling out of certain areas.

seekingalpha.com

And that means that this rally is a suckers rally. If you cant make money issuing a credit card to some high scoring fico believer, there is real trouble.

fool.com

What does COF see the future looking like? They don't want new business; they want to just survive.

What scares COF?

blogs.wsj.com
Bankers’ Worry: Worst Is Yet To Come



To: mishedlo who wrote (97266)5/5/2009 10:31:46 PM
From: dave9  Respond to of 116555
 
Bankers’ Worry: Worst Is Yet To Come

By David Wessel. The Wall Street Journal.

New loans may be profitable, given how cheaply banks can borrow today. But many banks are still worrying about whether they’ll get paid back on old loans.

The latest Federal Reserve survey of senior loan officers finds very few shoots of green in that garden. The Fed asked senior loan officers: What is your bank’s outlook for delinquencies and charge-offs on existing loans of various sorts in 2009, assuming that “economic activity progresses in line with consensus forecasts?” Short answer: Gloomy. Or as the Fed put it: “A significant majority of banks reported that credit quality for all types of loans is likely to deteriorate over the year” — and that’s assuming the economy doesn’t take another turn for the worse.

The specifics:

* Commercial and industrial loans: Of 52 banks responding, none said they expect improving quality, but seven said they expect delinquencies and charge offs to stabilize at current levels.
* Commercial real-estate loans: Only 1 of 51 banks (the other doesn’t make such loans) sees improving quality, and three see quality stabilizing at current levels. Of the 47 who see a worsening picture, 13 expected a substantial deterioration in 2009.
* Prime residential mortgages: Only 1 of 50 banks sees improving quality, and seven see quality stabilizing at current levels.
* Subprime mortgages: No bank sees improving quality, and only two see quality stabilizing at current levels.
* Home equity lines: No bank sees improving quality, though nine expect quality to stabilize around current levels.
* Credit card loans: None of the 31 banks who make such loans expects improvement, and three expect stabilization.
* Other consumer loans: Only 1 of 50 banks expects improvement, though 12 see loan quality stabilizing around current levels

blogs.wsj.com

My highlights. No. None. Only 1 of 50 banks sees improving conditions. That bank, the 1 of 50, needs to drug test their senior loan office. It looks like the rally is about over.

This is a good search
google.com



To: mishedlo who wrote (97266)5/6/2009 7:55:01 PM
From: Wyätt Gwyön  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
why does somebody with an 800 FICO need more credit cards anyway. there's a story not being told there. they should do away with FICO, too many soon-to-be deadbeats have high scores.



To: mishedlo who wrote (97266)5/7/2009 5:18:38 PM
From: roguedolphin1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116555
 
800 Credit Score and denied a credit card...
Message 25628924

To: LondonGuy who wrote (17276) 5/7/2009 3:45:12 PM
From: SliderOnTheBlack 4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 17310

800 Credit Score and denied a credit card...

Interesting first hand story from a reader of Mish's
blog who was turned down by Capitol One for a new
credit card, even though he has an 800 credit score.

But, the 800 credit score isn't the story... because
Capitol One didn't even pull a credit report.

They actually sent him a denial letter telling him that
due to the "economic downturn" in his geographical area
[Tampa, Florida], they didn't even pull a credit report
and turned him down, simply because of where he lived!

That used to be called "red lining."

That story really hits home for me, because years ago
I lived in Tampa, and for like five years running it
was listed in USA Today's Top 10 Cities for economic
opportunity and quality of life.

But that was then, and this is now...

globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com

I've been pounding the table with both fists since day one
of the bankster bailout - that the FDIC and banking
regulators were in the banks and telling the banks - the
exact opposite of what Paulson & Bernanke were telling
Congress and the American public.

They stood there and blatantly lied to our faces, about
TARP taxpayer money being used to lend and stimulate the
economy.

And now, people have discovered the money trail where billions
were delivered into AIG's front door, only to see it being
snuck out the back door, and handed to Goldman Sachs.

Even after Meredith Whitney dropped a reality bomb on the
market a month, or so back when she said banks were in the
process of literally "cutting off" 50% of all outstanding
and available consumer credit in America - people refused
to believe it.

Believe it.

I had a V.P. of a mega-Regional Bank tell me right after
TARP was approved... that they received "orders" to start
cutting off credit. Which they did, and are still doing.

For those who are still drinking the Kool-Aid, maybe this
will help...

Here's the The April 2009 Senior Loan Officer Opinion
Survey on Bank Lending Practices from the Fed.

Consumer credit is tight, and getting tighter:

federalreserve.gov

"Somewhat larger net percentages of domestic banks than in the
January survey reported having tightened credit standards on
residential mortgages."

Perhaps more important than tight consumer credit,
is collapsing demand...

"Respondents indicated that demand for loans from both
businesses and households continued to weaken for nearly
all types of loans over the survey period."

re: C&I Loans...

"Large majorities of both domestic and foreign banks reported
a less favorable or more uncertain economic outlook, a
worsening of industry-specific problems, and a reduced
tolerance for risk as important reasons for tightening credit
standards and terms on C&I loans.

A substantial majority of foreign respondents also indicated
that an increase in defaults by borrowers in public debt
markets, decreased liquidity in the secondary market for
business loans, and deterioration in their banks' expected
capital position were important reasons for the change in C&I
lending policies over the survey period."

All foreign respondents and 37 of the 38 domestic banks that
saw weaker demand for C&I loans over the previous three months
indicated that a decrease in their customers' needs to finance
investment in plant or equipment was an important reason for
the change in loan demand.

Substantial majorities of the domestic institutions that had
experienced such weaker demand also pointed to decreases in
their customers' needs to finance inventories, accounts
receivable, and mergers and acquisitions.

----------------

And regarding the effect of a low rate environment for mortgages:

"Almost A Quarter Of US Homeowners Are Underwater"

bloomberg.com

May 6 (Bloomberg) -- A growing number of U.S. homeowners owe
more than their properties are worth after prices extended
their two-year decline in the first quarter, Zillow.com said.

About 21.8 percent of all owners were underwater as of March
31, the Seattle-based real estate data service said in a
report today...

-----------------

That's 22% of the market that can't refinance even if they
wanted to.

Add to that, the number who don't have "negative" equity, but
who don't have adequate equity to refinance (80% LTV), or
to draw any cash out to reduce debt, or to fund spending.

Add to that, the number of homeowners who have lost a job,
who have equity, but can no longer get a loan.

Add to that, the number of homeowners who have missed some
payments and negatively affected their credit, who no longer
can get a loan.

Add to that, the tighter standards on bank lending.

I've had people in the mortgage industry tell me that today,
they can finance less than 30-40% of the market that they
were able to... just a year ago.

With consumer credit getting shut off, with the the mortgage
refinance market perhaps 60-70% less than just a year
ago, and with consumers having no savings nest egg to fall
back on... ie:

seattletimes.nwsource.com

“A MetLife study released last week found that 50 percent of
Americans said they have only a one-month cushion — roughly
two paychecks — or less before they would be unable to fully
meet their financial obligations if they were to lose their
jobs. More disturbing is that 28 percent said they could not
make ends meet for longer than two weeks without their jobs.”

50 percent said they have only a one-month cushion or less
before they would be unable to fully meet their financial obligations.

28 percent said they could not make ends meet for longer
than two weeks.

29 percent of people earning $100,000+/year said they’d
struggle to pay bills after a month.

86 percent have cut back spending.

---------------

Tell me where consumer spending (2/3rds of GDP) is going to come from?

Dana Telsey just dropped a Meredith Whitney style
"reality bomb" on the market this morning while on CNBC,
concerning retail spending...

cnbc.com

"At both the high end and the low end, we are basically
seeing the consumer only buying "necessities."

What don't people understand about that?

Cars aren't selling.

Appliances aren't selling.

Clothes aren't selling.

People are only buying "necessities."

They have no savings.

Their 401K's just got cut in half.

The value of their house has collapsed by 25-50%.

Their friends, family, and neighbors are losing their jobs
at rates unseen in nearly 30 years.

And 60-70% of them can no longer use their home as their
ATM/savings account... which is what drove consumer
spending for the last 8 years.

And we have more bank bailouts, the GM & Chrysler bankruptcies,
and the coming collapse of Commercial Real Estate still to come.

And then there's always Fannie & Freddie.

...tick, tock.

Fwiw, in case no one noticed...

This rally started about the same time all the Tea Party,
and End the Fed demonstrations broke out.

And the fingerprints of GS, MS and the PPT are all over
this tape, and have been for two months, and it's gotten
so sloppy in after hours that it's laughable.

The biggest boost to this market came when GS, MS, JPM,
quit naked shorting... and started carrying the PPT's water.

They may be able to keep this market levitated a while longer,
and they may even be able to gun it higher. I don't deny
that possibility. Just quit pointing to cow patties and
telling me they're greenshoots.

SOTB

PS: DOW -120 and counting.

PPS: Late Edit...

Maria Bartiromo on CNBC just reports:

Consumer credit fell $11+ Billion last month,
over 5%... the largest drop in 19 years...

And it ain't done dropping...

You can bank on it.