SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KyrosL who wrote (49680)5/6/2009 9:43:11 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 218030
 
:0) amazing, but never mind, as you cannot be serious, must be joking

in the mean time, just in in-tray

Obama, intends to raise $210 billion over a decade by revising a tax policy that lets companies defer income earned abroad, and by closing a loophole that administration officials say lets firms hide foreign subsidiaries.

David Roche, global strategist at Independent Strategy, thinks the reason why Obama is pursuing this so aggressively is very simple - money.

"First of all, the Obama administration is going to see government debt-to-GDP in the U.S. go to 80 percent. He's running almost unfinanciable budget deficits close to 12 percent this year, probably 8 percent in the long term. Its (U.S. government) going to go after anything that is money in order to try to limit the damage its doing through its fiscal policies, and that includes the rich and corporations," Roche said.

Roche is in agreement with Ross that this is a bad move.

"If you undertake measures, whether they are fiscal or the way you direct bank lending or whatever, which stops the global flow of capital, it prevents investments being made in the most productive place to have those investments. This of course runs counter with globalization. It is in fact deglobalization. And this is a bad measure," Roche added.




To: KyrosL who wrote (49680)5/6/2009 10:40:05 AM
From: Tommaso1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218030
 
Not true about platinum. Much needed and little North American supply.



To: KyrosL who wrote (49680)5/6/2009 8:18:41 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 218030
 
Kyros,

I believe that in 2007 the US GDP was just under 80% comprised by services.. I wonder how much of that was financial services and in a retreat to NA... who is going to need all those services ?

That's akin to expecting the US economy to continue to be 70% consumer fueled... They need a new plan..

As Jay knows I'm more optimistic than he is on this possibly working out.. but they are on a tightrope.. so
one false move...

TBS