SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (49707)5/6/2009 8:34:07 PM
From: KyrosL1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218038
 
As I have said, my isolation plan is a "dark interregnum" option, which I consider highly improbable. And it does include the current NAFTA members as part of "fortress America". Maybe South America too. Obviously, the US will have to get back to manufacturing some of the stuff it imports, using the multitudes that are now occupied in financial services and nail salons. Mexico can get back to inexpensive manufacturing, replacing Asia. We can pay for Mexican imports with American natural gas. In a few years the US will be exporting energy to Mexico, not the other way around.

Mq and TJ think that trade and globalization are essential for the health of the USA. Their view point is distorted because they live in countries where trade IS essential.



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (49707)5/7/2009 2:31:44 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218038
 
US need to boost exports. Asia needs to boost consumption. Emerging countries must develop internally diminish exports while the US needs to boost exports.

Problem is Europe which ia already export driven. They need to deflate dramatically.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News