Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (480057)	5/12/2009 1:49:56 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573927

>>> Everyone agreed Iraq was a serious threat that needed to be dealt with. Exactly. Case closed. There remain, until this day, there are many tons of Mustard gas, Sarin, and Tabun, as well as VX nerve gas unaccounted for. Iraq claimed to produced a total of 3,859 Tons of useable chemical agent, and claimed it had weaponized 3,315 Tons and used 80% of that. So, there is a total of about 1,100 TONS of chemical agent still missing. Under the UN mandate, they were required to account for these weapons. In the meantime, Saddam was acting as guilty as OJ. In December, 2002, Blix's position was as outlined below. How in HELL can a rational person with these facts oppose the Iraq War? You just cannot do it, given the history of the dictatorship and the possibility that he may choose to make some of those agents or components to the terrorists who had just killed 3,000 innocent Americans. It would have been grossly incompetent for Bush not to have acted. And it is entirely hypocritical and two-faced for you [liberals] to be taking the positions you are today. ================= Chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix has said Iraq's new declaration contains little information that had not been declared by Baghdad before 1998 when UN arms experts were last in Iraq. The US and UK have long had concerns about what is described as unaccounted for chemical, biological and nuclear material. Their assessments were partly based on a report by the weapons inspections organisation Unscom, predecessor to Unmovic. In early 1999, Unscom gave the Security Council its own assessment of what Iraq had destroyed and what remained unaccounted for. The US and UK want a full explanation of what happened to the following: * 360 tonnes of chemical warfare agents, including 1.5 tonnes of VX nerve agent; * 3,000 tonnes of chemical precursors (which are developed into chemical weapons) including 300 tonnes uniquely used for VX. The 1999 Unscom report said: "According to Iraq, 1.5 tonnes of VX were discarded unilaterally by dumping on the ground. Traces of one VX-degradation product and a chemical known as a VX-stabilizer were found in the samples taken from the VX dump sites. A quantified assessment is not possible." Biological Britain and America want to know about: * Growth media for 20,000 litres of biological warfare agents. Any Iraqi claims that this will have degenerated will not be accepted as mustard gas found in shells in 1997 was active; * Shells for use in biological warfare - 20,000 are missing say the British, 15,000 say the Americans; Unscom said in 1999: "The commission has little or no confidence in Iraq's accounting for proscribed items for which physical evidence is lacking or inconclusive, documentation is sparse or nonexistent, and coherence and consistency is lacking. These include, for example: quantities and types of munitions available for biological weapons (BW) filling; quantities and types of munitions filled with BW agents; quantities and type of bulk agents produced; quantities of bulk agents used in filling; quantities of bulk agents destroyed; quantities of growth media acquired for the programme; and quantities of growth media used/consumed. In addition, the commission has no confidence that all bulk agents have been destroyed; that no BW munitions or weapons remain in Iraq; and that a BW capability does not still exist in Iraq." Chemical warfare munitions Washington and London demand disclosure on: * 6,000 chemical warfare bombs. Unscom said: The commission has accepted the destruction of about 34,000 munitions on the basis of multiple sources, including physical evidence, documents provided by Iraq etc. However, it has not been possible to achieve a numerical accounting of destroyed munitions due to heavy bomb damage of the CW storage facilities, where these munitions had been stored during the Gulf war. The destruction of about 2,000 unfilled munitions remain uncertain, 550 filled munitions remain unaccounted for. Other key concerns for the US and UK include the following: Why did Iraq try to import 60,000 aluminium tubes? Rapidly spinning rotor tubes in centrifuges are used to separate weapons grade uranium, though both the British and American reports acknowledge that the tubes could be used for conventional weapons as well. Why did it try to import other equipment, including vacuum pumps, a winding machine and special chemicals needed in gas centrifuge cascades?