SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (260204)5/15/2009 9:16:44 AM
From: JCB01Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 275872
 
That all depends on what your definition of the "spirit of the law" is.
Everybody has anti-trust laws. Some methods of competing that are legal at 30% market share become illegal at 70% market share. That's just the law; "dura lex sed lex". And you could be right; Intel may find itself in the position of subsidizing a competitor that currently has an inferior product just about across the board - through no fault of Intel's.
As far as I can tell the bottom line is this: Intel may have misbehaved at a time when AMD was mounting a challenge. If the judgment is upheld, they will be fined; worse, AMD will probably be able to sue Intel for damages in various European courts. Most damaging, I think, would be some sort of consent decree that forces Intel to share its x86 IP.... for free.
If all this were to hit, I would say OK it's bad - but it's temporary. Intel still leads the world in process development - they can set a pace no one else can match. And they don't just have some of the finest designers - they have teams of the finest designers. So publish a standard discount schedule that's used for everybody - then continue to develop and innovate. Advertise the heck out of what you are doing so people won't want to be stuck with somebody else's old inferior technology. In a few years AMD would be down to working the niches with VIA.