Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (260461)	5/20/2009 10:53:02 AM
From: fastpathguru	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

>any legal violation is based on ill-defined antitrust laws where the line between aggressive competition and monopolization is blurry and subject to legal debate. This line is troublesome. It has been the view here that any disagreement with the EU's decision has been limited to delusional Intel supporters. As you know, there have been lots of editorials denouncing the EU's decision. Guess they are all delusional Intel supporters too. LOL... The debate occurred, and the EC decision reflects the outcome of that debate, coupled with its rationale. The guy who wrote that "article" is indeed a delusional Intel supporter, parroting Intel's talking points and denying without basis that the EC's decision even makes certain claims, for instance that consumers were harmed by Intel's behavior. fpg PS: To debate the legal basis of the decision is to concede the debatable behavior... Are you feeling the need to shift to that line of defense?