SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fastpathguru who wrote (260462)5/20/2009 12:08:47 PM
From: Elmer PhudRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
The debate occurred, and the EC decision reflects the outcome of that debate, coupled with its rationale.

Ahh wrong. No debate occurred. A debate is between 2 sides. Only one side was heard here. Intel's side will be heard in a court of law.

The article linked to was only one of many in leading publications. If you want me to post them all I can do that but like Intel, it's best to let the talking be done in court. The point is that if you think only Intel supporters are criticizing this ruling then you're the delusional one.



To: fastpathguru who wrote (260462)5/20/2009 4:53:39 PM
From: WindsockRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Gary Shapiro who wrote the article is the President & CEO of the Consumer Electronics Association. You can spit woof cookies all you want but CEA is not a captive of Intel. The CEA represents lots of OEM's who buy Intel processors and from AMD. It also represents retailers who sell computer products.

I am not aware of a single OEM who has complained about receiving an Intel rebate.

FYI, both AMD and Intel are members of the CEA.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News