SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: average joe who wrote (50574)5/28/2009 6:46:15 PM
From: Gib Bogle5 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218805
 
That post is really begging for a response. The US is very tough on petty offences - the jails are stuffed with pot-smokers - but the seriously corrupt big boys are untouchable. Who in the world has committed crimes on the scale of Bush & Cheney recently?



To: average joe who wrote (50574)5/28/2009 11:20:24 PM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218805
 
You are confusing two things: rule of the law, with 'law of the land'.

Then you map those two things (Jesus! you do sound like Elroy!) on top of two different mindsets.

Let me prepare a coffee and give this simpleton a lesson. Because I not only give the lesson, I want the guy to fell bad and humiliated. will back in a minute.



To: average joe who wrote (50574)5/29/2009 12:20:02 AM
From: elmatador1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218805
 
the meaning of vacatur. A Latin word because law was invented by Latin tribe called Romans.

I have scant respect for he rule of the law, as any honest man should. That put me in pole position to deal with the law of the jungle.

But lets take first the term vacatur and explain why the rule of the law is applied and Enron guy would be free as a bird soon.
businessweek.com

Applying the rule of the law is a process. It is not and event. Applying the rule of the law as Skilling case shows, it has been taking a few years.

By the time he gets free people would have quieted down, the case will not be in the pages of the newspapers. While process goes, the resentment also vanishes. And keep people believing the law has prevailed.

The legal system has had 500 years to perfect itself so the simpleton citizens don't see as many "corrupt cops, judges and politicians". Luckily you have Elmat to take that wool that you have over your eyes.

I am tempted to say that a certain tribe here is the only one who never forgets what its been done to them. Bu they will appear here in droves defending themselves. So I will not mention that 'an eye for an eye' tribe by their name.
(I carry their DNA, that is why I am retaliating swiftly after you now not to let you scape free, as a lesson, to dissuade you and to show there are consequences here in this thread.)

Since the sentence was declared vacatur, the court ordered Skilling be resentenced, opening up an opportunity to reduce his sentence from its current 24 years.

About ten years. Pretty soon he will be free as bird.

After learning how to read, we move to the next point.

The warband called the Anglos are not the ones whose cases do not reach courts.

Only that 'an eye for an eye' and their neighbors solve their problems the old fashioned way, i.e., by the 'law of the land'.

The Anglos, have different flavors: American flavor, Canadian, British and Australians flavors.

A people who would honestly believed in the rule of the law, would not "retaliate swiftly and sharply when it presents itself".

This is more for the tribes who use the 'law of the land' as a mechanism to live in society. (And we know how it ends and we have tried that too). For the rule of the law is not a channel for a vendetta. It is to see justice being done.

Now to the explicit point you had replied to: There are three entities:
The state. The constituted power

The country. The physical USA

The nation. The people. Here is the individual level where you and Elroy live.

Skilling is the state using their rules to deal with a case.
What I was talking about was the citizen Elmat applying common sense for a matter that has a direct impact on his modus vivendi.

It is not theory, it is fact. I deal for my livelyhood, with the law of the jungle. Agents whom I never seen in real life. Shell companies in Malta, Cyprus, Mauritius.

It is me against the jungle. And I have done that since 1993. Thus I am a survivor in that jungle.

In such a jungle I have never ever been downgraded to the animals that live in it. I refused to become one of them.