Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (8675)	5/29/2009 4:09:52 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 86356

Some sexual disfunction is moral in your view and some is beyond the pale. And you don't know why. That comes from looking to liberal fashion as your moral guide. -------------------- So is the near universal human preference for male-female sex vs same sex relations. Not nearly. Believe it or not I took a college course in Taboos. Wild class, the professor was totally bizarre. I'm sure you've had some bizarre professors in your time, but what I said is still true. Fact is there are people who go in for unnatural things, like homosexuality and incest. Are you trying to link incest and homos? What's your point? Of course, there are people who go in for unnatural things, like homosexuality and incest. Homosexuality and incest therefore are similar in that respect. My point is there's no reason society needs to recognize the unions of either group as marriages. If one set of unions are to be honored by society, there's no reason to deny the same for the other perversion.